Monitoring the Russian Federation
Reply to Written question
| Doc. 12296
| 19 June 2010
- Author(s):
- Committee of Ministers
- Origin
- adopted
at the 1088th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies (16 June 2010) 2010 - Third part-session
- Reply to Written question
- : Written question no. 583 (Doc. 12172)
Written Question
No. 583 by Mr MacShane (Doc.
12172)
The Committee of Ministers is monitoring the state of implementation
of the accession and other specific commitments by various member
states of the Council of Europe. These regular “monitoring” reports
(with different titles – monitoring, fact-finding, stock-taking
or information/assistance) are prepared by the Secretariat or Committee’s
Groups with different time-intervals pursuant to the decisions of
the Committee of Ministers adopted under the so called 94 Declaration
or on the basis of other respective decisions of the Committee.
During the last 5 years these reports have been prepared on
a regular basis in relation to Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bosnia and Herzegovina,
Georgia, Moldova, Montenegro and Serbia. I have also consulted three
reports prepared in 2009 by the Secretary General on “The Council
of Europe and the conflict in Georgia – Activities for the promotion
of Council of Europe values and standards” (SG/Inf(2009)5; SG/Inf(2009)5add
and SG/Inf(2009)5 add2), which include the charts presenting the
state of implementation of accession commitments by Georgia and
the Russian Federation.
After thorough examination of the information provided in
all the above-mentioned “monitoring” reports, it becomes clear that
the situation with the implementation of commitments differs, in
quality and quantity from state to state. However, I was struck
by the fact that during the last 5 years there was not a single
report about the state of implementation of commitments by the Russian
Federation. Although, the abovementioned SG/Inf(2009)5 report and
addendums provide with the charts, they first of all do not sufficiently
present the state of commitment realisation and secondly, where
more detailed information is available, it more or less covers the state
of implementation of those commitments that are linked with the
political conflicts in the territory of former USSR.
Keeping in mind the internationally available reports on the
state of democracy, rule of law and Human Rights in the Russian
Federation, I would like to ask the Committee of Ministers the following
questions:
1 Does the Committee
of Ministers consider that the state of realisation of Council of
Europe commitments in the Russian Federation is far more advanced
than in all the above-listed member states that are under the Committee
of Ministers “monitoring”?
2 Why the Committee of Ministers is not “monitoring” the
Russian Federation by using any of the existing “monitoring” procedures
or formats available and applied to other above-stated member states
of the Council of Europe?
Reply by the Committee of Ministers
1. In reply to the Honourable Parliamentarian’s
question, the Committee of Ministers wishes to emphasise the importance
it attaches to monitoring member states' compliance with the undertakings
they enter into when joining the Organisation and when ratifying
various Council of Europe conventions.
2. It is responsible for ensuring that the different treaties
to which member states are party are properly implemented, in accordance
with the relevant provisions of those treaties. It exercises this
prerogative with regard to all member states, including the Russian
Federation. For example, under Article 46 of the Convention for
the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, the Committee
of Ministers is regularly called on to determine whether the Russian
Federation is taking the necessary steps to remedy the consequences
of breaches of the Convention identified by the European Court of
Human Rights. The Committee of Ministers also monitors the application
of the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities
and the European Social Charter, which came into force in the Russian
Federation on 1 December 1998 and 1 December 2009 respectively.
3. Each year, the Committee of Ministers examines the annual
report of the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture (CPT),
which covers the Committee's activities in all the States Parties
to the European Convention for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman
or Degrading Treatment or Punishment. In this connection, it notes
that Parliamentary Assembly
Resolution
1315 (2003) called on the Russian authorities to publish the CPT's
reports and that, in reply to Parliamentary Assembly
Recommendation 1517 (2001), the Committee of Ministers itself encouraged all parties
to the Convention to authorise publication, at the earliest opportunity,
of all CPT visit reports and their responses. It will shortly be
returning to this matter when it prepares its draft reply to Written
Question No. 579 by Mrs Taktakishvili on “The publication of CPT
reports”.
4. The Committee of Ministers is informed of the situation regarding
racism and discrimination in the Russian Federation in the reports
of the European Commission against Racism and Intolerance (ECRI).
5. The Committee has regular meetings with the Commissioner for
Human Rights, where he informs it of the results of his visits to
the country. These meetings are also an opportunity for the Committee
of Ministers to discuss these matters.
6. In addition, when preparing the replies it is required to
make to written questions and recommendations from the Parliamentary
Assembly, the Committee of Ministers regularly considers various
aspects of democracy, the rule of law and human rights in Europe.
Many of the questions and recommendations of this type relate specifically
to the situation in the Russian Federation.
7. The Committee of Ministers confirms that, in accordance with
its "Declaration on compliance with commitments accepted by member
states of the Council of Europe" of 10 November 1994, it may be
asked, particularly by the Parliamentary Assembly, to consider compliance
with undertakings regarding democracy, human rights and the rule
of law in any of the member states. For example, in the past the
Parliamentary Assembly has specifically requested it to consider
the situation in Chechnya.
8. Finally, at the request of the Ministers' Deputies, the Secretary
General prepared a consolidated report on the conflict in Georgia,
which he presented to them at their 1084th meeting. This report
includes information on a number of the Russian Federation's obligations
and undertakings vis-à-vis the Council of Europe with a direct bearing
on the conflict.