Legal remedies for human rights violations in the North-Caucasus Region
Reply to Recommendation
| Doc. 12480
| 24 January 2011
- Author(s):
- Committee of Ministers
- Origin
- adopted
at the 1103rd meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies (19-20 January
2011) 2011 - First part-session
- Reply to Recommendation
- : Recommendation 1922
(2010)
- Thesaurus
1. The Committee of Ministers has carefully
considered Parliamentary Assembly
Recommendation 1922 (2010) on “Legal remedies for human rights violations in the
North Caucasus Region”. The Committee shares the concern expressed
by the Assembly in this recommendation and also considers it essential
to ensure that human rights and the rule of law are respected in
the difficult context of the North Caucasus. It supports and encourages
the efforts made by the authorities of the Russian Federation to
this end.
2. Bearing collective responsibility for respect for the Council
of Europe's values in Europe, the Committee naturally has cause
to monitor carefully the human rights situation in this region.
It does so particularly in the context of the supervision by the
Committee, under Article 46 of the European Convention on Human
Rights, of the execution of judgments of the European Court of Human
Rights. In connection with its supervision of the execution of
judgments delivered by the Court regarding the activities of the
security forces in the Chechen Republic, the Committee of Ministers
has given priority to the issues concerning the legislative and
regulatory framework applicable to internal investigations and the
rights of victims, in order to ensure that this offers sufficient
guarantees that investigations undertaken in response to Court judgments
will be effective. Since April 2009, co-operation with the Russian
authorities on these issues has been stepped up in the context of
a project financed by the Human Rights Trust Fund.
3. However, the Committee of Ministers has stressed on a number
of occasions that the effectiveness of these measures cannot be
assessed in the abstract but will very much depend on how they are
applied in practice to individual cases. The Committee of Ministers
has therefore invited the Russian authorities to supply it with
information on the subject as soon as possible.
4. In addition to the situation in the Chechen Republic, the
Committee of Ministers has also, since March 2010, been supervising
the execution of the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights
in the Medova v. Russia case,
in which the Court considered that the authorities had failed in
their duty to conduct an effective investigation into the abduction
of the applicant's husband in Ingushetia in June 2004 by a group
of armed men who identified themselves as Federal Security Service
officers. The Russian authorities have been invited to submit an
action plan for execution of this judgment and others which constitute
the group of Medova cases. The Committee recalls that in accordance
with its decision adopted at its 1100th meeting (DH) (30 November – 2 December
2010), all cases will be placed on the agenda of each DH meeting
of the Deputies until the supervision of their execution is closed,
unless the Committee were to decide otherwise in the light of the development
of the execution process.
5. As the Committee is closely following developments in the
region, it will endeavour to use all the available mechanisms to
support the authorities of the Russian Federation in their efforts
to ensure respect for standards of democracy, human rights and the
rule of law in the North Caucasus. Furthermore, the reports submitted
to it regularly by the Commissioner for Human Rights on his visits
to the Russian Federation and its examination of the reports of
the Council of Europe's various monitoring bodies concerning this
country afford an opportunity to the Committee to keep a close watch
on developments in the human rights and rule of law situation in
the North Caucasus.
6. On this point, the Committee reiterates that it attaches great
value to the work of the European Committee for the Prevention of
Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) and welcomes
the fact that the Russian authorities recently announced their intention
to follow the general practice of lifting the confidentiality of
all the reports on visits by the CPT and authorise their publication.
7. The Committee of Ministers also draws attention to the fact
that, since 2004, the Council of Europe has been implementing a
special co-operation programme for the Chechen Republic in co-operation
with the office of the Human Rights Ombudsman of the Russian Federation.
The programme aims in particular to promote the application of
Council of Europe democracy and human rights standards and strengthen
the rule of law. Since 2009, some of the activities undertaken under
this programme have been open to other subjects of the Southern
Federal District, and now of the North Caucasus Federal District,
of the Russian Federation. The Committee of Ministers is prepared
to consider any request for further assistance to the North Caucasus
that the Russian authorities might wish to make. The Committee of
Ministers furthermore underlines the importance of non‑governmental
activities geared towards raising awareness and establishing a rights
based approach. Comments from NGOs are taken into accout by the
relevant institutions of the Council of Europe.
8. The Committee shares the Parliamentary Assembly's opinion
as to the importance of an effort of recollection and truth in connection
with human rights violations. It considers that the establishment
of a record-keeping system of the type suggested by the Assembly
in its recommendation would also help to combat the risk of impunity
and the lack of effective investigation of alleged violations of
the European Convention on Human Rights. The Committee of Ministers
nevertheless considers that it is not within the Council of Europe's
remit to set up such a record-keeping system, irrespective of whether
it relates to the human rights situation in the North Caucasus or
in other parts of Europe. A recollection and truth effort of this kind
must be conducted mainly in the countries concerned, with the involvement
of all the interested parties, and above all with the participation
of civil society. The Committee of Ministers recommends that the
Russian Federation consider taking such initiatives, to which the
Council of Europe could contribute through activities which come
within the Organisation's remit.