6.2.1 systematically invite the heads
of national delegations to its meetings dealing with lists of candidates,
in order to allow them to provide additional information on candidates
and national selection procedures followed;
6.2.2 collect, through its chair, objective facts such as availability
or language skills relating to the work of incumbents seeking re-election,
in particular from the CPT’s Bureau;
6.2.3 reject lists of candidates when relevant information is
missing, even when not all candidates are concerned, and when not
all candidates fulfil the minimum requirements under the convention;
6.2.4 reject lists of candidates which do not include at least
one man and one woman, except when all candidates on the list are
of the sex under-represented on the CPT (less than 40%);
6.2.5 interview candidates on a case-by-case basis, if it finds
that information provided in the curriculum vitae or by the chair
of the national delegation concerned is not sufficient in order
to enable it to make an enlightened choice, or if the national pre-selection
procedures are considered unsatisfactory (see paragraphs 6.1.1 to
6.1.4 above);
6.2.6 attach particular importance to the preferences expressed
by national delegations when the national pre-selection procedures
are satisfactory (see paragraphs 6.1.1 to 6.1.4 above);
6.2.7 give succinct reasons for its recommendations to the Bureau
of the Assembly;
