Preventing vaccine discrimination
Reply to Recommendation
| Doc. 15800
| 20 June 2023
- Author(s):
- Committee of Ministers
- Origin
- Adopted at the 1469th meeting
of the Ministers’ Deputies (14 June 2023). 2023 - Third part-session
- Reply to Recommendation
- : Recommendation 2240
(2022)
1. The Committee of Ministers has carefully
examined Parliamentary Assembly
Recommendation 2240 (2022) “Preventing
vaccine discrimination”. The recommendation has been brought to
the attention of the governments of the member States and forwarded
to the relevant committees for information and possible comments.
Note
2. Whilst the height of the Covid-19 pandemic has passed, the
Committee of Ministers concurs with the Assembly on the need to
“reflect on the impact of requirements to use Covid passes and in
particular vaccine passes on human rights and fundamental freedoms”,
in case new public health measures of a similar nature may be deemed
necessary in the future. The Committee of Ministers welcomes the
fact that health crises are at the heart of the first thematic report
of the Observatory for History Teaching in Europe (OHTE), and strongly hopes
that the history of pandemics, medical progress, the development
of vaccines and other public health measures will be better taught
to the younger generations, in order to strengthen their level of
preparedness in the face of epidemic risk.
3. The Committee of Ministers can inform the Assembly that its
Steering Committee for Human Rights in the fields of Biomedicine
and Health (CDBIO) maintains an ongoing reflection on ways to be
better prepared and resilient to future threats and to ensure that
the human rights and fundamental freedoms of all individuals are
promoted and protected. A statement on “Covid-19 and vaccines: ensuring
equitable of access to vaccination during the current and future
pandemics” was issued by the CDBIO. Vaccine discrimination also increases
the risk of counterfeit vaccines and counterfeit anti-Covid passes
going on sale: the Committee of Ministers welcomes the opinion on
the application of the Medicrime Convention in the context of counterfeit Covid-19
vaccines, and calls on member States that have not yet done so to
ratify the “Medicrime Convention”. In a
statement on
human rights considerations relevant to a “vaccine pass” and similar
documents, the Council of Europe
Committee on
Bioethics (DH-BIO) called for careful deliberation on
the challenges raised by such a pass. It pointed out in particular
that “subject to the possibility for everyone to access vaccination,
the differentiated treatment of vaccinated or immunised persons
and those who cannot prove such a status in the exercise of individual
freedoms and access to some services would be likely to bring the
principle of non-discrimination into play. This includes risks of
discrimination in relation to the right to freedom of movement and to
freedom of assembly, but also rights to privacy and risks of stigmatisation
as underlined by the Secretary General in her information document
on “
Protection
of human rights and the “vaccine pass””.
4. The CDBIO also regularly exchanges information and best practices
on these issues with other international organisations, such as
the United Nations, the World Health Organization (WHO), and the European
Union. It also co-operates with other international organisations
and bodies as outlined in its
Strategic
Action Plan on Human Rights and Technologies in Biomedicine (2020-2025) and
enjoys longstanding co-operation with the WHO. Furthermore, the
Council of Europe is an associated member of the UN Inter-Agency
Committee on Bioethics (UNIACB) where it exchanges information and
co-ordinates relevant activities with UN agencies.
5. Finally, the Committee of Ministers underlines that reflection
on the impact of “Covid passes”, and in particular vaccine passes,
on human rights and fundamental freedoms from vaccinated or immunised
persons and those who are not (regardless of the reason), should
also take into account the jurisprudence of the European Court of
Human Rights, which points to the fact that vaccination protects
both those who receive it and also those who cannot be vaccinated
for medical reasons and are therefore reliant on herd immunity for protection
against serious contagious diseases (see the judgment of the European
Court of Human Rights in the case of Vavřička
& otrs v. Czech Republic, app. no. 47621/13 et al,
Grand Chamber, 8 April 2021).