Letter from Ms Rosa Velázquez Álvarez, Ambassador, Permanent Representative of Spain to the Council of Europe, to Ms Despina Chatzivassiliou, Secretary General of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe, dated 16 July 2026.
Madam Secretary General,
In accordance with instructions, I have the honour to reply to your letter of 8 August 2025 concerning the list of candidates for the election of a judge to the European Court of Human Rights in respect of Spain.
The selection procedure was published by Order PJC/2025/2026 of 11 March 2026, in accordance with the provisions of Article 3 of Royal Decree 972/2020 of 10 November 2020, which regulates the selection procedure for the nomination of candidates by the Kingdom of Spain with a view to the appointment of members of the Court of Justice of the European Union and the European Court of Human Rights.
Pursuant to the decision of the Council of Ministers of 26 May 2026, the following candidates are proposed, in alphabetical order:
I would be grateful if you could forward this information, together with the attached documents, which include the CVs of the three candidates, to the Committee on the Election of Judges to the European Court of Human Rights.
(…)
Extracts from the Certification regarding the proposed shortlist of three candidates, as prepared by the secretary of the Selection Committee, 22 June 2026:
(…)
2.The call for candidates to replace the judge currently representing Spain, Ms María Elósegui Itxaso, was made in Order PJC/205/2026 of 11 March 2026, launching the selection process for the nomination by the Kingdom of Spain of three candidates for election as judge to the European Court of Human Rights (https://www.boe.es/diario_boe/txt.php?id=BOE-A-2026-5731), which was amended by Order PJC/207/2026 of 12 March 2026, amending Order PJC/205/2026 of 11 March 2026 (https://www.boe.es/diario_boe/txt.php?id=BOE-A-2026-5897).
The legal basis of said order launching the selection process lies in Royal Decree 972/2020 of 10 November 2020, regulating the selection process for the proposal of candidates by the Kingdom of Spain when nominating members for the Court of Justice of the European Union and of the European Court of Human Rights.
3.The selection process was publicised by means of the publication of the aforementioned Order launching the selection process in the Official State Gazette (BOE) of 11 March 2026 and publication of the subsequent correction of errors, as well as by means of its posting on the noticeboard of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
4.The Selection Committee was created by virtue of the aforementioned Order PJC/205/2026 and comprised the following members:
5.Of the 30 applications received, one candidate was excluded because they exceeded the maximum age limit.
Of the 29 candidates whose applications were accepted, 12 were women and 17 men.
Four of the candidates admitted withdrew their candidacies during the selection process.
6.The principles of merit and capability were respected during every phase of the process. The process also respected the principle of equal treatment between women and men in accessing public sector employment, in accordance with Organic Law 3/2007 of 22 March, on effective equality between women and men, as well as the principle of equal access to positions in the civil service and in public office set forth in Article 23.2 of the Constitution. The call for candidates also respected the principles of equality and non-discrimination of persons with disabilities. The corresponding minutes were written up for each session held by the Committee.
7.The Selection Committee met on seven occasions, on 13, 16, 17, 21 and 29 April and on 5 and 18 May 2026, to approve the list of candidates admitted, to interview candidates and to decide which candidates to propose to the Council of Ministers to be subsequently presented to the Council of Europe’s Advisory Panel of Experts on Candidates for Election as Judge to the European Court of Human Rights, pursuant to the provisions of the Order launching the selection process and of Royal Decree 972/2020.
The Committee conducted in-person interviews with all the candidates admitted, except for the 4 candidates who withdrew their candidacies during the selection process and another who failed to appear at the interview to which they had been invited.
The aim of said interviews was to be able to assess as best possible whether the candidates met the criteria set out in Article 21 of the European Convention on Human Rights, i.e. to determine whether they:
To assess the candidates on the basis of said criteria, the Selection Committee gave particular consideration to the criteria for evaluation of the qualifications of the candidates set out in Section V of the Fifth activity report for the attention of the Committee of Ministers, of 5 November [sic], prepared by the Advisory Panel of Experts on Candidates for Election as Judge to the European Court of Human Rights.
The same format was followed in all the interviews, with each candidate being asked questions by different members of the Committee on the following matters:
All the interviews were held in English, French and Spanish, and attended by two accredited interpreters of the Office of Interpretation of Languages of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
8.After assessing the documentation provided by each candidate, and after concluding the interview process, on 18 May 2026 the Selection Committee decided by means of a majority vote on a shortlist of three candidates to propose to the Council of Ministers for the latter to approve, as the case might be, and submit to the Advisory Panel of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe. The Selection Committee considered that the three candidates proposed were the most suitable of all the candidates that met the requirements established in the call for candidates, taking into account the merits and assessment criteria set out in the call’s rules, and considering the criteria, merits and capabilities of the candidates, applying, to this end, the assessment criteria established in Order PJC/205/2026 of 11 March, launching the selection process for the nomination by the Kingdom of Spain of three candidates for election as judge to the European Court of Human Rights, the order launching the selection process, as well as in the Guidelines of the Committee of Ministers on the selection of candidates for the post of judge at the European Court of Human Rights adopted on 28 March 2012, and the criteria for evaluation of the qualifications of the candidates set out in Section V of the Fifth activity report for the attention of the Committee of Ministers, of 5 November 2025, prepared by the Advisory Panel of Experts on Candidates for Election as Judge to the European Court of Human Rights.
9.The minutes of the Committee session held on 18 May 2026 reflect the following as regards the assessment of the candidates included on the shortlist proposed to the Council of Ministers:
Said candidates stood out, in the opinion of the majority of the Committee, firstly owing to their proficiency in law, including specifically their extensive knowledge of international public law, their understanding of the categories and general principles of the European Convention on Human Rights and their command of the case-law and proceedings of the European Court of Human Rights, as well as of the responsibilities of a judge of said Court, in terms of independence, impartiality and the necessary availability to work full time, together with extensive knowledge of the theory and/or practice of the legal system of other States Parties to the European Convention on Human Rights. Secondly, they provided evidence of extensive professional experience in a European or international context. And, lastly, they demonstrated excellent levels of linguistic competence in the two official languages of the Council of Europe.
The aforementioned members of the Committee based their proposal on the following grounds, set out individually for each of the three candidates:
Mr LUIS JIMENA QUESADA has proven, both in the documentation provided and during the interview conducted, significant understanding of the categories and general principles of the European Convention on Human Rights. Of particular note is his considerable professional experience in the field of human rights, as a Member and as President of the Council of Europe’s European Committee of Social Rights and as an independent person representing the Council of Europe before the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA), and also as Substitute Judge of the High Court of Justice (Administrative Division) of the Autonomous Community of Valencia, where he has written more than four hundred judgments as Judge Rapporteur. He is currently an ad hoc judge representing Spain at the European Court of Human Rights and General Secretary of the International Institute of Human Rights, based in Strasbourg. During the interview he demonstrated an exhaustive knowledge of the categories of the European Convention on Human Rights system and of case-law, offering an in-depth exposition on the proceedings of the European Court of Human Rights, displaying robust legal reasoning and strong language skills in both English and French, including a command of the legal terminology necessary for deliberating and drafting judgments.
Ms ANA MARÍA SALINAS DE FRÍAS has proven, both in the documentation provided and during the interview conducted, substantial understanding of the categories and general principles of international public law and international relations, and in particular of the European Convention on Human Rights. Of particular note is her professional experience in the field of human rights, including both her work as a university researcher and professor and as an independent expert advisor to the Council of Europe. Currently an ad hoc judge representing Spain at the ECHR, she has extensive experience of training judges and prosecutors in the European human rights system, as well as in the field of research into human rights, having produced numerous publications and participated in several specialised forums. During the interview, she demonstrated extensive knowledge of the European Convention on Human Rights and of case-law, including of how case-law has evolved, referencing numerous specific judgments during the interview. She also displayed complete familiarity with the proceedings of the Court and strong communication skills, as well as substantial mastery of English and French, including of legal terminology.
Mr DANIEL SARMIENTO RAMÍREZ-ESCUDERO has proven, both in the documentation provided and during the interview conducted, extensive professional experience in the European judicial sphere, having been a legal secretary at the CJEU for 8 years, working as part of a team and participating in the drafting of documents on the European system for the protection of human rights. He is currently a practising lawyer specialising in litigation brought before the European courts; his procedural experience includes participation in numerous proceedings linked to fundamental rights. His academic work is also focused on human rights and the functioning of the European courts and he has produced numerous publications and collaborated with highly prestigious universities and institutions. During the interview he demonstrated strong legal and intellectual capabilities, substantial knowledge of the categories of the European Convention on Human Rights system and of the case-law and proceedings of the European Court of Human Rights, as well as excellent legal reasoning and the ability to communicate clearly, precisely and succinctly and an excellent command of English and French, making precise and appropriate use of legal terminology in both languages.
The above does not signify that some of the other candidates do not also possess highly significant strengths, but in the opinion of the majority of the Selection Committee, any comparison with those demonstrated by Mr Jimena, Ms Salinas and Mr Sarmiento is favourable to the latter three, who are deemed to have demonstrated more and greater strengths, as their résumés, knowledge, experience and capabilities considered together are more complete and more comprehensively and exhaustively meet the full set of assessment criteria. Therefore, it is the opinion of the majority of the Committee that these are the three candidates who must be included on the shortlist.
10.On 17 April, the Selection Committee was notified that an administrative appeal had been filed against the Order launching the selection process and against tacit exclusion from the process, by the candidate (…), with an application for the emergency relief provided for in Article 135 of the Act regulating the Administrative Jurisdiction, as well as of the submission by which the said candidate informed the Presidency, Justice and Parliamentary Relations of the provisional measures requested to suspend the selection process. Both the emergency relief and the provisional measures requested were rejected by the National High Court before the Selection Committee submitted its proposal to the Council of Ministers, and therefore the Selection Committee continued with its duties until it had submitted the proposal to the Council of Ministers.
11.The Council of Ministers, at its meeting of 26 May 2026, at the proposal of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, European Union and Co-operation and of the Ministry of the Presidency, Justice and Parliamentary Relations, adopted a decision approving the shortlist of three candidates of the Kingdom of Spain for election as judge to the European Court of Human Rights proposed by the Selection Committee, and its conveyance to the Council of Europe’s Advisory Panel of Experts on Candidates for Election as Judge to the European Court of Human Rights.
The said decision was announced in Order PJC/513/2026 of 26 May 2026 of the Ministry of the Presidency of the Government, Justice and Parliamentary Relations, publishing the Decision of the Council of Ministers of 26 May 2026, approving the shortlist of three candidates of the Kingdom of Spain for election as judge to the European Court of Human Rights and its conveyance to the Council of Europe’s Advisory Panel of Experts on Candidates for Election as Judge to the European Court of Human Rights (Official State Gazette of 27 May 2026).
12.The aforementioned Decision of the Council of Ministers was contested by means of two administrative appeals filed by two candidates (…) on which a ruling has yet to be made.
On 16 June 2026, the Administrative Division of the Supreme Court issued two provisional measures orders in the aforementioned appeal proceedings rejecting said requests for suspension of the process.
(…)
Name: JIMENA QUESADA, Luis
Gender: male
Date and place of birth: 29 February 1968 in Massamagrell, Valencia, Spain
Nationality: Spanish
Certificates and Diplomas:
Other qualifications:
This shows that European Human Rights standards, as well as the so-called multi-level protection of human rights has always been taken into account not only in my academic background, but also in a consistent manner in my judicial experience.
- Former Member and President of the European Committee of Social Rights (ECSR) of the Council of Europe (2009-2014). See the HUDOC database of the European Social Charter (integrated with the HUDOC database of the ECtHR): https://hudoc.esc.coe.int/.
Obviously, my name appear in the framework of the adoption of many resolutions from the ECSR (“conclusions” in the context of the reporting system, as well as decisions – on the admissibility, on the merits or on immediate measures – in the context of the collective complaint procedure), where the case-law from both the Court of Strasbourg and the ECJ of Luxembourg has been often used and explicitly mentioned.
Of course, further to the case-law from both European Courts, other materials concerning International Human Rights Standards (e.g., from United Nations, the Human Rights Committee or the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, among other human rights treaty bodies) have also inspired the so-called case-law of the ECSR, mainly in the context of the collective complaint procedure, which has a clear judicial profile.
- Independent person (alternate) representing the Council of Europe in Management and Executive Boards of the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) (2015-2020). During these five years (in touch with the independent person, Professor Rainer Hoffman, and eventually replacing him), I experienced in a very fruitful manner the synergies between the EU (and its member States) and the Council of Europe in the field of, among others, the links between the ECHR and the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, as well as soft-law human rights instruments (related to asylum and migration, data protection and new technologies, non-discrimination, justice and victim’s rights, human rights systems and defenders, or environmental and social sustainability).
-
As described (supra), my judicial and non-judicial legal activities have been marked by the realisation of human rights. Moreover, it is worth highlighting these other activities:
And experiences:
Only in the framework of the University of Valencia:
-
Author of several hundred publications in the fields of Constitutional Law and International Human Rights Law, including 17 books, 287 articles and chapters (70 international and 217 national), as well as 111 other publications (17 international and 94 national, including book prefaces, reviews, commentaries and translations of Court judgments).
These are my 10 most important titles (only books -single author, with the exception of number 9) directly related to Judicial Protection of Human Rights at Constitutional, European and International Levels:
|
Language |
English |
French |
Catalan |
Italian |
German |
|
Reading. |
Advanced |
Advanced |
Advanced |
Advanced |
Basic |
|
Writing. |
Advanced |
Advanced |
Advanced |
Intermediate |
|
|
Listening. |
Advanced |
Advanced |
Advanced |
Advanced |
|
|
Speaking. |
Advanced |
Advanced |
Advanced |
Advanced |
|
|
How acquired? |
O.S.L.* |
O.S.L. |
|
O.S.L. &Centro Leopardi |
O.S.L |
*Official School of Languages.
|
Language |
Reading |
Writing |
Speaking |
||||||
|
very good |
good |
Fair |
very good |
Good |
Fair |
very good |
good |
fair |
|
|
a. First language: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SPANISH (Mother Tongue) |
X |
X |
X |
||||||
|
b. Official languages: |
|
|
|
||||||
|
– English |
X |
X |
X |
||||||
|
– French |
X |
X |
X |
||||||
|
c. Other languages: |
|
|
|
||||||
|
- Valencian/Catalan |
X |
X |
X |
||||||
|
-Italian |
X |
X |
X |
||||||
|
-German |
X |
||||||||
Advanced level of both English and French (official certificate from the Valencian Official School of Languages), as well as Advanced level of Valencian/Catalan (official certificate from the University of Valencia) and Italian (official certificate from the Official School of Languages –Valencia and Castellón– and “Centro Leopardi” in Valencia), as well as Basic level of German (2 up of 5 academic years at the Valencian Official School of Languages).
Awards and academic recognitions and distinctions:
In the event that you do not meet the level of language proficiency required for the post of judge in an official language, please confirm your intention to follow intensive language classes of the language concerned prior to, and if need be also at the beginning of, your term of duty if elected a judge on the Court (please tick the box to confirm).
[X] Yes, I confirm. I meet the level of language proficiency (advanced level, officially certified) in both official languages of the Council of Europe (French and English).
Please confirm that you will take up permanent residence in Strasbourg if elected a judge on the Court (please tic the box to confirm).
[X] Yes, I confirm.
Name: SALINAS DE FRIAS, Ana María
Gender: female
Date and place of birth: 10 July 1967 in Málaga, Spain
Nationality: Spanish
1. Appointed ad hoc judge on behalf of the Kingdom of Spain from April 2019 until now.
I first took part in the call for the post of sitting judge at the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) on behalf of the Kingdom of Spain. My CV was accepted and I took part in the interview process but, finally, I was not elected. Once this procedure was completed, I took part in the call for the appointment of judges ad hoc by the Spanish Government, my nomination having been approved by the European Court at the instances of the Spanish Government.
2. Responsible for training Ukraine judges (2011) on the ECHR, TEJSU Project, Council of Europe. The training took place on two different dates (3-day course) and focused on main substantive provisions of the ECHR and related Court case law, from a theoretical and a practical approach.
3. Responsible for the development of the curricula of the HELP programme (EU/Council of Europe joint programme for training of legal professionals throughout Europe) on Prevention of Radicalisation and Violent Extremism in English and Spanish, addressed to European judges and prosecutors. These curricula include wide knowledge on current legal instruments on the issue and extensive reference to related European Court of Human Rights case law.
4. Responsible person for training of judges, magistrates and prosecutors. National Coordinator for Spain and academic coordinator, HELP course on “Countering radicalisation and violent extremism” (2018).
Legal Advisor, DLAPIL, CoE (09/01/2009 – 31/12/2010). Legal advice delivered on International Law issues, e.g Parliamentary Assembly’s right to electing the Secretary General of the Council of Europe; entry into force of Treaty of Lisbon.
Assessment to CAHDI: drafting Protocol 14bis; working group on EU/ECHR Draft Accession Agreement. Assessment to CODEXTER: creation of the COP, Council of Europe Convention 196; organising international conferences (2009, 2014, 2017).
Independent Legal Expert (since 01/01/2011). Activity developed imply deep knowledge of content and functioning of the ECHR/Court and its case law: methodology followed; legal reasoning; rights’ content and pertinent case law by other international/constitutional courts; other international instruments. In particular: legal advice provided to governments (compatibility of the new Tunisian law on terrorism and Council of Europe human rights standards)
Assessment on training programs on human rights for civil servants (legal advisors, ombudspersons officials, public prosecutors, judges and magistrates) and State security bodies (policemen, prisons officers, military) (Turkey, 2012; Israel, 2014; Morocco, 2017; Mali, 2022).
Legal training on the fight against terrorism through specific programs (Albania, Armenia, Macedonia, Turkey, Jordan).
Training on different Council of Europe conventions (Ukraine, 2010 and 2011).
Drafting of legal reports/opinions: CDPC/PC-OC: “How to improve Council of Europe mechanisms on international legal co-operation on criminal matters and the terrorism foreign fighters phenomenon” (2015); CODEXTER: “Current links between Terrorism and Transnational Organized Crime” (2017); CDCT: “Report on the definition of terrorism provided by UN sectoral Conventions” (2019); MEDICRIME Committee: “Feasibility and the legal nature of a Guidance note in the context of the MEDICRIME Convention” (2021); 6. Drafting publications at the instances of the Council of Europe.
Other organisations: CTED evaluation sessions (Marrakech, 2016: Algeria, Mauritania, Morocco, Libya, Tunis); UNODC judges & prosecutors’ training (Mali, 2022); UNODC workshop on human rights (Marrakech, 2023: Libyan, Jordan and Moroccan police, customs officers & law enforcement agents); CT-Inflow Conference (Malta, 2022; magistrates, judges, prosecutors; Iraq, Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia, Libya).
Full professor, Public International Law, EU Law & International Relations, University of Málaga (Spain) (since 01/11/2000). Research and academic activities.
Research activity: scientific contributions in top standard periodicals (see VII). Team leader: coordinating research activities and publications; organising international conferences and publications; drafting and communicating research outputs.
National and international research projects (selection):
Academic activity: teaching to national and international students (graduate, post graduate, doctoral) in universities/other institutions, Spain and abroad (ENA, France; IIDH, France; Emirates Diplomatic Academy, UAE). Teaching in many universities in Europe, Latin America, United States, Asia and Africa.
Presentations at specialised fora (selection): The Security Imperative and Counter-Terrorism, ILA, 2012, UK; International Law, Counter-Terrorism and the Concept of “Prevention”, ASIL, Washington, 2012; Links between terrorism and TOC, CODEXTER, Council of Europe, 2017; The new EU Regulation on withdrawal of terrorist contents from the Internet, EUROJUST, 2021; Contribution to the joint side event to the UNGA meeting, GCTF & The IIJ, New York, 2023, ECtHR and Art. 6 ECHR; Opening Conference “Garantías del debido proceso”, I Encuentro Altas Cortes de Colombia, 2025; GCTF Brussels Memorandum launch event, Brussels, 2025.
Four main groups of activities: high-quality publications specialised on human rights (see VII); courses taught specifically on human rights (see III); presentations on human rights made at highly specialised fora; legal advice provided on human rights.
“La protección de los Derechos Fundamentales de carácter social y económico en la UE”, AEPDIRI, Andorra, 1993.
International Co-operation, CoE Colloquium “Bringing Terrorists to Justice: promoting the implementation of European Standards and documenting good practices”, Skopje, 2010.
“La protección del medio ambiente en la jurisprudencia del TEDH: un derecho del ciudadano y un objetivo de la UE”, Cursos de Derechos Humanos de Vitoria-Gasteiz, 2012.
“The role of the promotion and strengthening of economic, social and cultural rights in preventing terrorism”, NATO Science for Peace and Security Programme, Milan, 2014.
“Walls and persons in contemporary International Law”, Courses on Human Rights of San Sebastian, 2017.
“UN Reform, The Rule of Law, and Counter-Terrorism: How can past lessons inform future responses?”, UN, New York, 2012.
Report by the European Union Institute for Security Studies on “Co-operation to halt and avert mass atrocities”, Brussels, 2012.
Report on the compatibility of the new Israel law on terrorism and the ECHR and the Council of Europe Convention 196, Tel Aviv, 2014.
Legal assessment on the Council of Europe mechanisms on international legal co-operation on criminal matters and the terrorism foreign fighters’ phenomenon, Council of Europe Committee on Cooperation on Criminal Matters (PC-OC), 2015.
Report on current links between terrorism and TOC”. Council of Europe CDPC and Council of Europe CODEXTER, 2016.
Report on the definition of terrorism provided by UN sectoral Conventions, Working Group of CDCT, 2019.
Design: structure and contents of HELP on-line course on combating violent extremism and radicalisation conducive to terrorism.
Identification of best practices in prison with regard to radicalised prisoners’ human rights; design and implementation of prison policies on countering radicalisation in prisons.
Design: structure and contents of on-line CEPOL training course on Terrorism and TOC for European police forces.
Deputy Dean for research, students and international relations, Faculty of Law, University of Málaga (1998-2003).
Deputy-Rector (Vice-President) University of Málaga, Spain, (2004-2009). Main activities: Vice-president for Researching and for Doctorate studies; Chairperson of the Doctoral Commission, University of Málaga; responsible person for approval of Ph.D and master’s degree programmes; head of University of Malaga Library; head of the University of Málaga Publications Service and Chairperson of its Scientific Council; representation of the University of Málaga in meetings at national and international levels.
Legal advisor, DLAPIL, Council of Europe (2009-2011)
UNICAJA BANK Foundation, Member of the Board (Patronato) (since 2022). Main tasks: active contribution to the design and planning of social support activities; wide intervention in cultural and sport activities. As main stakeholder of UNICAJA Bank, approval of most important economic decisions adopted by the Bank.
Full professor and Chair of Public International Law and International Relations at the University of Málaga.
Member of the Board, European Society of International Law (ESIL) (2020-2026, two terms). Organisation of international scientific activities: annual conferences, interest groups seminars, research fora, etc., for associated and non-associated members; close co-operation with legal practitioners in the concerned fields as well as with international organisations; co-operation with other brother societies at the national and international level.
Deputy-President of the Spanish Society of International Law (2018-2021). Main tasks: coordination of three scientific branches in Spain: Public International Law, Private International Law and International Relations as for seminars and other scientific activities of associated members; coordination of university teaching curricula as for the three aforementioned branches all over Spain; close co-operation with legal practitioners in the three fields, as well as with international organisations.
President of the Spanish Society of International Law (AEPDIRI) (2021-2025). Main tasks: same tasks (see above). Also representing the Society in other conferences, meetings, etc.
Member of the Real Academy of Legislation and Jurisprudence of Granada, elected by unanimity (since 2023). Main tasks: widening the knowledge of Law and its national and international implementation.
No membership of any political organisation or trade union.
ZONTA International: NGO devoted to women’s empowerment and protection of women and children with a consultative status before ECOSOC, UN. Member and secretary of the ZONTA International-Málaga branch (2011-2013). Tasks: technical advice, data analysis, creation of a women rights’ observatory, fieldwork with children and teenager girls at refuge house.
Member of Red Cross Spain, ACNUR (UNHCR).
1. Membership of scientific associations:
2. Membership of scientific or advisory boards, etc.
3. Experience as a peer-reviewer for the following journals:
Total number of specialised publications on International and European Law: 72
Ten most relevant publications specifically related to Human Rights:
|
Language |
English |
French |
Spanish |
|
Reading |
C2 |
C2 |
L1 |
|
Writing |
C2 |
C2 |
L1 |
|
Listening |
C2 |
C2 |
L1 |
|
Speaking |
C2 |
C2 |
L1 |
|
How acquired? |
Official school of Languages |
Official School of Languages/Alliance Française |
Mother language |
In the event that you do not meet the level of language proficiency required for the post of judge in an official language, please confirm your intention to follow intensive language classes of the language concerned prior to, and if need be also at the beginning of, your term of duty if elected a judge on the Court (please tick the box to confirm).
[X] Yes, I confirm.
Please confirm that you will take up permanent residence in Strasbourg if elected a judge on the Court (please tick the box to confirm).
[X] Yes, I confirm
Name: SARMIENTO RAMIREZ-ESCUDERO, Daniel
Gender: male
Date and place of birth: 14 December 1975 in Bilbao, Spain
Nationality: Spanish
Daniel Sarmiento is Professor of European Union Law and Administrative Law at the Universidad Complutense de Madrid and a recognised scholar in European constitutional and human rights law.
He studied law at the University of Granada, graduating with honours (1999), and later obtained his doctorate at the Universidad Complutense de Madrid (2003), where he was awarded the Extraordinary Doctoral Prize.
His academic training has been complemented by extensive research experience at leading European institutions, including the University of Oxford and the Max Planck Institute for International and European Procedural Law in Luxembourg.
Professor Sarmiento has developed an academic career devoted to European constitutional law, fundamental rights protection and the functioning of European courts. His research focuses on the interaction between the European Convention on Human Rights, the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights and national constitutional traditions.
He has taught and lectured at numerous leading European universities and institutions, including Oxford, Cambridge, Paris-Sorbonne, Bocconi, Leiden, the Diplomatic Academy of Vienna and the Max Planck Society.
From 2007 to 2015 Daniel Sarmiento served as référendaire (legal secretary) at the Court of Justice of the European Union, working in the chambers of Advocates General Ruiz-Jarabo Colomer, Cruz Villalón and Eleanor Sharpston.
In this capacity he participated directly in the preparation of several landmark cases in the field of fundamental rights and constitutional law in Europe, such as Åkerberg Fransson on the scope of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, Ruiz Zambrano on the substance of rights attached to EU citizenship, and eDate Advertising on jurisdiction and the protection of personality rights in the digital environment, inter alia.
His work at the Court of Justice involved participation in the drafting of legal internal documents, Opinions of Advocates General, comparative constitutional analysis and the interpretation of European fundamental rights instruments. It also required constant engagement with the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights and the broader European system of rights protection.
Between 2006 and 2008 he also acted as legal advisor to the Spanish Supreme Court on issues concerning the interpretation and application of European law, including matters related to the implementation of the European Convention of Human Rights.
Professor of European Union Law at the Universidad Complutense de Madrid.
Daniel Sarmiento is an ANECA-accredited professor and currently holds the posts of full professor of Administrative Law and European Union Law at the Universidad Complutense de f Madrid, professor of European Constitutional Law at Bocconi University in Milan, associate professor at IE University, and professor at the Diplomatische Akademie in Vienna.
Practising lawyer specialised in litigation in European courts.
Following his experience at the Court of Justice, Professor Sarmiento has developed an extensive practice in European litigation. He has acted as lead counsel mainly in proceedings before the Court of Justice and the General Court of the EU, representing member States, EU institutions, non-governmental organisations and private parties in complex disputes concerning EU constitutional law, internal market regulation and the protection of fundamental rights.
His litigation practice covers a broad range of areas, including constitutional litigation concerning the rule of law and judicial independence, transparency and access to documents, consumer protection, and the compatibility of national regulatory frameworks with European law. He has participated in proceedings concerning the protection of judicial independence and the enforcement of European values under Article 2 TEU, issues closely connected to the broader European framework for the protection of democracy and fundamental rights.
In addition, Professor Sarmiento is Editor-in-Chief of EU Law Live, a widely specialized platform providing analysis of developments in European law and the jurisprudence of European courts.
He also provides pro bono legal advice through initiatives assisting civil society organisations working in the field of fundamental rights and the rule of law in Europe.
Professor Sarmiento has played an active role in European academic and institutional networks devoted to the study and dissemination of European law and human rights.
He has specialised and directed numerous international conferences and seminars devoted to constitutional developments in Europe, judicial co-operation and the protection of fundamental rights. These activities have been conducted in co-operation with leading institutions such as the College of Europe, the Max Planck Institute and Fundación FIDE.
He has also served as co-director of the Forum on Procedural Law of the Court of Justice of the European Union, jointly with the Max Planck Institute in Luxembourg and the Luxembourg Centre for European Law.
Professor Sarmiento contributes regularly to the public debate on European law and human rights through academic publications, public lectures and contributions to specialised legal platforms.
He has also served on the editorial and advisory boards of several European law journals and acts as an external reviewer for international academic publications and research institutions.
The protection of fundamental rights in Europe has been a central focus of Daniel Sarmiento’s academic and professional career.
As référendaire at the Court of Justice of the European Union he worked on several landmark cases concerning the interpretation and application of fundamental rights in the European legal order. These included judgments clarifying the scope of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, the principle of ne bis in idem, and the protection of personal rights in the digital environment.
His academic work has extensively analysed the development of fundamental rights protection in Europe, with particular attention to the relationship between the European Convention on Human Rights, the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights and national constitutional traditions.
He has published numerous studies on judicial dialogue between European courts, the role of fundamental rights in European integration and the constitutional dimension of European citizenship.
Professor Sarmiento has also delivered specialised training programmes on human rights and European judicial protection at universities and professional training institutions throughout Europe. These programmes have included courses on the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, the protection of judicial independence, and the interaction between the jurisprudence of the Court of Justice and that of the European Court of Human Rights.
He has organised seminars dedicated specifically to the protection of the rule of law and judicial independence in Europe, including events analysing the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights in these fields.
In his professional practice he has participated in litigation concerning the protection of judicial independence and the enforcement of European values, issues closely related to the broader European framework of fundamental rights protection.
Through his academic research, litigation practice and institutional engagement, Professor Sarmiento has developed a comprehensive understanding of the European human rights system and of the interaction between national courts, the Court of Justice of the European Union and the European Court of Human Rights.
Daniel Sarmiento served as legal advisor to the Spanish Ministry of the Presidency in the years 2004 to 2006 on matters relating to constitutional and European law.
None
None
Vice-President of the Spanish Association for the Study of European Law (Asociación Española para el Estudio del Derecho Europeo, AEDEUR), Spanish branch of the Fédération Internationale pour le Droit Européen.
He is also co-President of the Spanish chapter of the International Society of Public Law (ICON-S), an international network of scholars and practitioners working on constitutional and public law issues.
He regularly acts as an external evaluator for academic journals and international research institutions and has participated in evaluation panels for European research grants.
Professor Sarmiento is the author of several monographs and more than one hundred academic publications on European constitutional law, fundamental rights and the judicial system of the European Union.
His work has contributed significantly to the academic understanding of the interaction between the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights, the Court of Justice of the European Union and national constitutional courts.
Selected publications:
|
Language |
English |
French |
|
Reading |
C1 |
C1 |
|
Writing |
C1 |
C2 |
|
Listenin |
C1 |
C2 |
|
Speakin |
C1 |
C2 |
|
How acquired? |
Primary and secondary education / Professional activity |
Primary and secondary education / Professional activity |
-
In the event that you do not meet the level of language proficiency required for the post of judge in an official language, please confirm your intention to follow intensive language classes of the language concerned prior to, and if need be also at the beginning of, your term of duty if elected a judge on the Court (please tick the box to confirm).
[X] Yes, I confirm.
Please confirm that you will take up permanent residence in Strasbourg if elected a judge on the Court (please tick the box to confirm).
[X] Yes, I confirm.