the first from 18th to 27th March, 1953;
the second from 27th April to 9th May, 1953;
the third from 9th to 17th June, 1953.
| NATURE OF THE PROBLEM | SUMMARISED CONCLUSIONS |
|---|---|
| International co-ordination of investments. | In order to achieve the best tion of investments. yield of investments which are intended to develop trade and especially international trade in the most advantageous conditions action should not be dispersed but must be judiciously co-ordinated on a European scale. |
| International financing of investments (Infrastructure). | This is a complex problem which extends beyond the sphere of transport, and it seems that there does not exist the necessary machinery to resolve this problem in a general way. |
| Unification of structure and of the principal provisions concerning transport rates. | At present, there is no international machinery covering all the countries represented at the Conference and capable of dealing with tariff questions as a whole and on a permanent basis, and on a European scale. |
| International standardisation of means of transport. | The existing bodies are capable of making an efficient study of standardisation at technical lovel, but its achievement raises economic, financial and industrial problems which must bo considered as a whole and on a European scale. |
| Development of pools of railway equipment. | The results achieved in this of railway equipment. connection through tho action of tho railway administrations supported by tho Governments may be considered satisfactory. These results could bo further extended if other administrations agree to participate in the pool, or, in the caso of large-gauge railways, increase the number of their wagons with interchangeable axles. Furthermore, the operation and development of tho pool raise certain problems which go beyond the sphere of transport, and which cannot be ignored by the Governments at European level. |
| International road transport system. | Generally, progress has been made in this matter, but under the present system, administrative formalities, as well as technical and economic difficulties, handicap the organisation of road transport. |
The Conference of Ministers of Transport, in the form proposed, might be designated " The European Conference of Ministers of Transport."
The administrative headquarters would be in Paris, on the understanding that the Conference of Ministers would be free to hold meetings elsewhere.
The proposed purposes would be as follows :
The Conference of Ministers, operating on a permanentNoteand pragmatic basis, would provide a forum at which the Ministers of Transport, acting within their terms of reference, would be able to discuss all matters of common interest with a view to working out practical measures for adoption in the countries represented, or giving concerted directives to their Delegates.
The Conference of Ministers would not have the power to take decisions binding on all Member Governments. However, in many cases, the measures approved by the Conference could be applied, without any international agreement, by the Ministers taking parallel administrative action, sponsoring the adoption of parallel governmental or legislative measures or taking all appropriate steps to ensure that the findings of the Conference are acted upon by the interested undertakings.
Finally, wherever international agreements were necessary, they could be concluded by the Ministers or their deputies, acting with full powers in the name of their Governments, either in a simplified form or if necessary in the usual manner (subject to ratification, and, if necessary, Parliamentary approval). In cases of this nature, the Conference of Ministers could also decide that its findings should be transmitted for adoption to existing international organisations having powers of decision.
The Conference of Ministers would include
1. The Council of Ministers would meet as often as was necessary to fulfil its purposes.
2. The Committee of Deputies, appointed by the Ministers, would meet between the sessions of the Council of Ministers to prepare for the meetings of the Council and to settle the questions delegated to them by the Council of Ministers.
3. The Secretaries should perform only administrative duties and should include only a few persons who, in the execution of their duties, would be dependent solely on the Conference of Ministers.
These principles being clearly understood, it is suggested that for practical and mainly financial reasons, the Secretaries of the Conference should be attached, for administrative purposes, to the O. E. E. C. and paid by this Organisation, on the understanding that their appointment would be approved by, and they would act under the instructions of, the Conference of Ministers. The 0. E. E. C. would also be requested to make the practical arrangements for the proper working of the Conference.
Countries not members of 0. E. E. C. should make a fair contribution to the resulting expenditure under an arrangement to be concluded between them and the 0. E. E. C.
4. In view of the fact that the Secretaries would be engaged on purely administrative tasks, the question arises what procedure would be applied for the technical preparation of the work of the Conference of Ministers, and, in particular, for liaison with the interested international organisations.
Some delegations were in favour of establishing a Steering Committee with a membership limited, for example, to 9 persons, selected for a limited period by the Conference of Ministers on grounds of competence in transport matters and in accordance with procedure to be laid down by the Conference.
This Steering Committee would constitute a permanent Working Party under the authority of the Council of Ministers and the Committee of Deputies, and would have the following main functions : to ensure the continuity of the work of the Conference of Ministers, and to assemble, hear and consider the views of the interested International Organisations.
On the other hand, most delegations were opposed to the formation of such a committee on the grounds that it would overburden the structure of the Conference of Ministers.
In their view, in order to ensure greater unity of outlook, the technical preparation of work should be left exclusively to the Committee of Deputies, which is also in a position to secure the necessary continuity. Moreover, the establishment of a Steering Committee would involve practical difficulties.
The final decision on this point was left to the Conference of Ministers.
5. Changes could be made subsequently in the structure of the Conference of Ministers by a unanimous decision.
(a) It would be necessary to define the rules applicable to the conduct of work of the Conference of Ministers and to the method of voting.
(b) In particular, the provisions should allow a group of countries to study and to discuss, within the Conference, questions which are of special interest to those countries and which, in their view, are covered by the purposes of the Conference.
The other countries represented at the Conference of Ministers would be allowed to take part in these studies and discussions, if they considered their interests were involved, but should not be able to oppose these studies and discussions being carried out by the Conference.
(c) Finally, conclusions indicating the practical measures decided by the Conference of Ministers, acting in plenary session or as a restricted group as referred to in (b) above, should, in each particular case, be accepted without being subject to the majority rule, each representative being entitled, in his own particular sphere, to accept the measures in question under the conditions and in the manner indicated in section III above (2nd sub-paragraph).
However, in cases where measures proposed by the Conference of Ministers lead to the conclusion of an international agreement for the reasons already given in section III above (3rd sub-paragraph), such an agreement could not be concluded within the Conference of Ministers, in the event of opposition by one or more member countries.
the Council of Europe, in view of the importance of transport in the accomplishment of the task which it has undertaken and its role in general European policy;
the Economic Commission for Europe (E. C. E.), in view of its special activity in the field of transport;
the O. E. E. C, in view of its competence in the field of European economic co-operation.
Berne Union for International Railway Transport;
Central Commission for the Navigation of the Rhine;
International Labour Organisation;
Chairman: Mr. A. Cattani, Ambassador, Head of the permanent Mission to the O. E. E. C. [Italy).
Vice-Chairmen :
Mr. G. Bauer, Minister Plenipotentiary, Head of the Permanent Mission to the O. E. E. C. (Switzerland).
Mr. G. de Sydow, Legal Adviser, Ministry of Communications (Sweden).
Austria
Mr. H. Prack, Head of the Permanent Mission to the O. E. E. C.
Mr. 0. Bazant-Hegemark, Central Inspector, Federal Ministry of Transport and Nationalised Agencies.
Mr. H. Lehnc, Ministerial Counsellor, Ministry of Trade and Rehabilitation.
Belgium
Mr. R. Coene, Consul General, Ministry of Foreign Affairs and External Trade, Head of Transport Section.
Mr. J. Vrebos, General Director of Transport, Ministry of Communications.
Mr. L. Charbonnier, Administrative Director, Ministry of Communications (Inland Waterways Administration).
Mr. Ch. Walhin, First Counsellor, Belgian Economic Co-operation Administration.
Mr. P. Nicolas, Engineer, Ministry of Communications.
Denmark
Mr. J. Bang-Christensen, Chief, Ministry of Ways and Communications.
Mr. A. Kristensen, Chief Inspector, The Danish State Railways.
Mr. K. E. Arnberg, Head of Division, The Danish State Railways.
Mr. S. Acker, Assistant Chief, Ministry of Public Works.
Mr. H. Tabor, Attached to Economic Affairs, Permanent Mission to the 0. E. E. C.
France
Mr. E. Dorges, General Secretary, Ministry of Public Works and Transport.
Mr. E. Corbin, Chief Engineer, Assistant to the General Secretary of Public Works and Transport.
Mr. de Dampierre, Embassy Secretary, Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
Mr. Deshors, Secretary, Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
Germany
Dr. Bergemann, Secretary of State, Federal Ministry of Transport.
Dr. Albrecht, Head of Department, Federal Ministry for Marshall Plan.
Dr. H. P. Jordan, Counsellor of Embassy, Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
Dr. Schulte-Meermann, Ministerial Counsellor, Federal Ministry of Transport.
Mr. Dumke, Counsellor, Federal Ministry for Marshall Plan.
Dr. Schander, Counsellor for Economic Affairs.
Dr. Schultz, Member of the Permanent Mission to the 0. E. E. C.
Greece
Mr. G. Milon, Technical Counsellor, Permanent Mission to the 0. E. E. C.
Mr. D. Manolakis, Secretary, Permanent Mission to the 0. E. E. C.
Italy
Mr. N. Laloni, Vice-General Director, State Railways, Ministry of Transport.
Mr. V. Perrone, Chief General Inspector, Minis try of Transport.
Mr. E. Roscioni, General Inspector, General Inspectorate on Road Traffic, Ministry of Transport.
Mr. A. Favara, Chief Inspector, State Railways, Ministry of Transport.
Mr. G. Santoni Rugiu, Chief Inspector, State Railways, Ministry of Transport.
Mr. A. Morganti, Chief Inspector, General Inspectorate on Road Traffic.
Luxemburg
Mr. T. Wehenkel, Chief Engineer, National Railways.
Mr. N. Hommel, Head of the Permanent Mission to the O. E. E. C.
Netherlands
Mr. W. L. de Vries, General Director, Ministry of Transport and of Waterstaat.
Mr. K. Vonk, Director, Ministry of Transport and of Waterstaat.
Mr. C. J. M. Schaepman, Envoy Extraordinary, Minister Plenipotentiary, Counsellor for Transport, Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
Mr. G. Dijkmans van Gunst, Director of Transport.
Mr. Tj. A. Meurs, Member of the Permanent Mission to the 0. E. E. C.
Mr. Scheffer, Counsellor, Ministry of Transport and of Waterstaat.
Mr. F. Goud, Head of Division, General Directorate for Economic Foreign Affairs.
Mr. H. J. H. Jansen, Ministry of Transport and of Waterstaat.
Mr. 0. Schoenewald, Member of the Permanent Delegation to the United Nations European Office.
Norway
Mr. A. Skaug, Ambassador, Head of the Permanent Mission to the 0. E. E. C.
Mr. E. Fien, Director, Ministry of Transport and Communications.
Mr. J. Ii. Paxal, Head of Division, Ministry of Transport and Communications.
Mr. 0. Solli, Secretary, Permanent Mission to the 0. E. E. C.
Portugal
Mr. R. T. Guerra, Minister Plenipotentiary, Head of the Permanent Mission to the 0. E. E. C.
Mr. A. L. Franco, First Secretary of Legation.
Mr. L. da Costa, Engineer, Head of Division, Inland Transport General Directorate.
Mr. C. de Azevedo-Nazareth de Souza, Engineer, Assistant Traffic Manager, Portuguese Railways.
Spain
Mr. J. de Aguinaga, Director General for Railways, Trams and Road Transport.
Mr. P. Cortina Mauri, Minister Plenipotentiary, Director for International Organisations, Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
Mr. C. Fesser Fernandez, General Inspector, General Directorate, Railways and Road Transport.
Mr. F. de Reparaz, Professor, Technical Engineering School for Roads.
Sweden
Mr. P. Asbrink, State Secretary, Ministry of Communications.
Mr. A. Sjôberg, Director of Finance and Economics, Royal State Railways.
Switzerland
Mr. J. Haenni, Vice-Director, Federal Transport Agency.
Mr. B. Tapernoux, Chief of Division, Federal Transport Agency.
Mr. P. S. Erni, Secretary to the Delegation.
Trieste (Free territory)
Mr. L. Sartori, Director of Finance and Economics.
Mr. A. Cosulich, President of the Chamber of Commerce.
Mr. P. Pilla, Chief Inspector, Transport Division.
Turkey
Mr. A. Tiney, Head of the Delegation to the 0. E. E. C.
Mr. A. Abisel, Technical Councillor, Ministry of Communications.
Mr. S. Karamusal, Counsellor, Permanent Mission to the 0. E. E. C.
Mr. A. Baycu, Director, Division of Planning and Programming General Directorate of Highways
United Kingdom
Brig. A. E. M. Walter, Director, International Inland Transport Branch, Ministry of Transport.
Mr. A. W. Clarke, Principal, Ministry of Transport.
Mr. H. B. Shepherd, Member of the Permanent Mission to the 0. E. E. C.
Yugoslavie
Mr. M. Iljadica, Chief of the Internationa Transport Section, General Directorate of Railways.
United States of America (associated Country)
Mr. Adison G. Foster, Chief, Transport Section, Mutual Security Agency (M. S. A./S. R. E.).
Mr. G. R. Clemens, Assistant Chief, Transport Section (M. S. A./S. R. E.).
Mr. James A. Little, Counsellor, Interstate Commerce Commission, Washington.
Mr. Loring Miller, Transport Division, M. S. A., Washington.
Mr. Laurent E. Morin, Vice Consul, American Embassy, Paris.
| ORGANISATION | NAME AND FUNCTION of tho principal Representative (s) |
|---|---|
| A. Supranational Authority. | |
| High Authority of the European Coal and Steel Community. | Mr. Klaer, Head of the Transport Division. Mr. R. Hutter, Deputy Head of the Transport Division. |
| B. Governmental Organisations with a general scope. | |
| Council of Europe. | Mr. M. Lemaire, Rapporteur of the Committee on Economic Questions of the Consultative Assembly. |
| United Nations Economic Commission for Europe. | Mr. P. Charguéraud- Hartmann, Director of the Transport Division. |
| C. Specialised governmental Organisations. | |
| Bern Union for International Railway Transport. | Mr. R. Cottier, Director. |
| Central Commission for the Navigation of the Rhine. | Mr. H. Walther, Secretary- General. |
| International Labour Organisation. | Mr. A. Evans, Division of Industrial Commissions. |
| D. Non-governmental Organisations. | |
| International Union of Railways. | Mr. L. Armand, Chairman. |
| International Road Transport Union. | Mr. Richard-Deshais, Vice-Chairman. |
| International Road Federation. | Mr. G. Gallienne, Chairman. |
| International Union of Inland Waterways. | Mr. P. Brousse, Chairman. |
| International Chamber of Commerce. | Mr. L. Devreux, Chairman, Committee for the co-ordination of transport. |
| International Transport worker's Federation. | Mr. P. Tofahrn, Assistant Secretary - General. |
| International Federation of Forwarding Associations. | Mr. M. de Brousse, President. |
| World Touring and Automobile Organisation. | Mr. M. H. Perlowski, Secretary-General. |