Towards a uniform interpretation of Council of Europe conventions: creation of a general judicial authority
Recommendation 1458
(2000)
- Author(s):
- Parliamentary Assembly
- Origin
- Assembly debate on 6 April 2000 (15th Sitting) (see Doc. 8662, report of the Committee on Legal Affairs and Human Rights, rapporteur: Mr Svoboda). Text adopted by the Assembly on 6 April2000 (15th Sitting).
- Thesaurus
1. The Assembly recalls that the aim of the
Council of Europe is to achieve a greater unity between its members, and
considers that this aim may be pursued inter alia by the conclusion of
international treaties.
2. There are now more than 175 conventions and protocols concluded within
the Council of Europe.
3. The existence of a large corpus of legally binding texts requires
efficient and effective mechanisms of monitoring and control.
4. There is also a need for uniform interpretation and application of the
Council of Europe conventions in the different member states and among the
different legal instruments.
5. The Assembly is therefore convinced that it is necessary that the member
states of the Council of Europe should agree on a procedure that would ensure a
uniform interpretation of legal texts commonly agreed by them.
6. The Assembly is aware of the fact that a certain number of Council of
Europe conventions - such as the European Convention on Human Rights and the
revised Social Charter, and others - already provide for mechanisms to ensure
control as well as uniform interpretation and application.
7. A large number of conventions have no such mechanism, however.
8. In addition to the increasing number of conventions, there is also an
increasing number of member states, and it is more difficult to speak of a
common legal tradition among them than it was in the past. Therefore a power on
the part of the “general” judicial authority to give - as well as legally
binding opinions - advisory, non-binding legal opinions could become a more
practical and more frequently used competence.
9. For these reasons the Assembly recommends that the Committee of Ministers
set up a “general judicial authority” of the Council of Europe which would
provide the mechanism for the uniform interpretation of Council of Europe
treaties starting with those still to be concluded and with a selected number
of the existing conventions. The competencies of the “general judicial
authority” would be three-fold:
9.1 to give
binding opinions on the interpretation and application of Council of Europe
conventions at the request of one or several member states or at the request of
the Committee of Ministers or of the Parliamentary Assembly;
9.2 to give non-binding opinions at the request of one or several member
states or of one of the two organs of the Council of Europe;
9.3 to make preliminary rulings, at the request of a national court, on
lines similar to those of Article 177 of the Rome Treaty of 1956 establishing
the European Economic Community.