The protection of freedom of expression and information on the Internet and online media

Doc. 12874: compendium of written amendments | Doc. 12874 | Final version

Contents

A Draft Resolution

B Draft Recommendation

Compendium index

Amendment 1 Amendment 2 Amendment 3 Amendment 4 Amendment 5 Amendment 6 Amendment 7

Caption: AdoptedRejectedWithdrawnNo electronic votes

ADraft Resolution

1The Parliamentary Assembly recalls the universal human right to freedom of expression and information under Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ETS No. 5, hereafter “the Convention”) and Article 19 of the United Nations International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. This right is typically exercised through the media and, nowadays, in particular through media based on new information and communication technologies (hereafter "ICT") such as the Internet and online media including mobile communication devices.

2Aligning itself with the United Nations Millennium Declaration of 8 September 2000, the Assembly welcomes the fast growing access to ICT-based media by the general public globally. Hence, it seems much more difficult for non-democratic regimes to deprive their population of information and an exchange of opinions necessary for any popular control of government. The Assembly strongly condemns the restrictions of access to the Internet and online media applied by the governments of China, Belarus and other countries.

• Amendment 2

24 April 2012

Tabled by Mr Alexander SIDYAKIN, Ms Elena NIKOLAEVA, Mr Valeriy ZERENKOV, Mr Alexey KNYSHOV, Mr Guennady ZIUGANOV, Mr Rafael HUSEYNOV, Mr Grigore PETRENCO

In the draft resolution, paragraph 2, replace the words "China, Belarus and other countries" with the words: "some countries".

Explanatory note

The report does not analyse the situation as regards freedom of expression in particular countries. It applies generally in the specific area of freedom of expression. In this respect, a reference to specific countries is irrelevant.

3The Assembly also welcomes the new possibilities for individuals to share publicly, through the Internet and online media, information which is of public concern, such as information about misgovernment, corruption and organised crime as well as human rights violations. In this respect, the Assembly appreciates the efforts of journalists and media to collect, analyse and disseminate in a professional manner the raw information provided by Internet sources.

• Amendment 3

24 April 2012

Tabled by Mr Anvar MAKHMUTOV, Mr Valeriy SUDARENKOV, Mr Yury SOLONIN, Mr Anton BELYAKOV, Mr Alexander SIDYAKIN

Votes: 2 in favor 51 against 1 abstention

In the draft resolution, at the end of paragraph 3, add the following words: "The Assembly firmly condemns the abuse of freedom of information for propaganda and the disinformation of the public opinion in certain countries and of the international community."

Explanatory note

The report expresses support for internet users' efforts to expose cases of misgovernment, corruption and organised crime, but is silent on the challenges and negative impact of using the Internet solely for propaganda and manipulation, which is becoming an increasingly important problem in inter-state relations and is leading to a split of the single cyberspace.

4Recalling its Resolution 1729 (2010) on the protection of "whistle-blowers", the Assembly reaffirms the right of everyone to disclose information of public concern which corresponds to the right of the public to be informed under Article 10 of the Convention. Member States must not curtail the right of the public to be informed by restricting the right of individuals to disclose information of public concern, for example by applying defamation and insult laws as well as national security and anti-terrorist laws in an overly broad and non-proportional manner

• Amendment 4
• Amendment 5

24 April 2012

Tabled by Mr Anvar MAKHMUTOV, Mr Valeriy SUDARENKOV, Mr Yury SOLONIN, Mr Anton BELYAKOV, Mr Alexander SIDYAKIN

Votes: 1 in favor 52 against 1 abstention

In the draft resolution, in paragraph 4, in the second sentence, delete the words "as well as national security and anti-terrorist laws".

Explanatory note

The terrorist threat persists in Russian and other European countries.

24 April 2012

Tabled by Mr Anvar MAKHMUTOV, Mr Valeriy SUDARENKOV, Mr Yury SOLONIN, Mr Anton BELYAKOV, Mr Alexander SIDYAKIN

Votes: 1 in favor 53 against 2 abstentions

In the draft resolution, at the end of paragraph 4, add the following words: "The observation of human rights online, including the freedom of expression and the freedom of access to Internet resources, should be consistent with the principles of non-interference in the internal affairs of states and of the inviolability of the state's sovereignty in the national information space."

5Referring to Articles 10, paragraph 2, and 17 of the Convention, the Assembly recalls, however, that no State, group or person may exercise freedom of expression and information for the destruction of any rights and freedoms set forth in the Convention, in particular the right to life, the right to a fair trial, the respect for private life and the protection of property. The Assembly puts strong emphasis on Article 20 of the United Nations International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights: any propaganda for war and any advocacy of national, racist or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence shall be prohibited by law.

• Amendment 6

24 April 2012

Tabled by Mr Anvar MAKHMUTOV, Mr Valeriy SUDARENKOV, Mr Yury SOLONIN, Mr Anton BELYAKOV, Mr Alexander SIDYAKIN

Votes: 15 in favor 37 against 5 abstentions

In the draft resolution, at the end of paragraph 5, add the following words: "The Assembly condemns the glorification of Nazism in all its manifestations as a form of dangerous extremism."

Explanatory note

Taking into account the negative trends in some European countries lately, this amendment would complement the statement that it is inadmissible to abuse freedom of information to violate fundamental human rights and freedoms on the Internet, and that it is necessary to condemn propaganda for war and racism.

6Recalling its Recommendation 1543 (2001) on racism and xenophobia in cyberspace, the Assembly regrets that some member States have not yet signed and ratified the Additional Protocol to the Convention on Cybercrime concerning the criminalisation of acts of a racist and xenophobic nature committed through computer systems (ETS No. 189). This protocol may be applicable, for example, in cases of incitement through the Internet to violence and terrorism based on racist or religious extremism.

• Amendment 1

17 April 2012

Tabled by the Committee on Culture, Science, Education and Media

In the draft resolution, after paragraph 6, insert the following paragraph:

"Referring to the wide criticism and concerns over the restriction of fundamental rights and freedoms, most notably the freedom of expression and communication privacy, raised by Internet stakeholders and governments as regards the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA) of 1 October 2011, the Assembly invites member States which are signatories to the ACTA to pursue public consultations about future domestic legislation resulting from the ACTA, taking into account Assembly Resolution 1744 (2010) on extra-institutional actors in the democratic system. Such domestic legislation must respect in particular Articles 6, 8 and 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights and Article 1 of its first Protocol (ETS No. 9). ACTA parties which are also Parties to the Convention on Cybercrime (ETS No. 185) or the Convention for the Protection of Individuals with regard to Automatic Processing of Personal Data (ETS No. 108) should not derogate from the latter conventions, in accordance with Article 1 of the ACTA."

7Article 10 of the Convention binds public authorities not to restrict freedom of expression and information, but it also entails the obligation for member States to ensure that this fundamental freedom is not threatened by any non-governmental or private sector participants. In this context, the Assembly refers also to Committee of Ministers Recommendation CM/Rec(2007)16 on measures to promote the public service value of the Internet and the Declaration of the Committee of Ministers of 29 September 2010 on network neutrality.

8The Assembly notes that access to ICT-based media for each individual and the public at large is mainly determined by private intermediaries. Many of them, such as Internet access or service providers and mobile phone or telecommunications companies, have a dominant position vis-à-vis individual users because they are system-relevant or exercise significant market power. In this context, the Assembly welcomes Resolution 17/4 on human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises adopted by the United Nations Human Rights Council on 16 June 2011.

9The Assembly is concerned that the intermediaries of ICT-based media might unduly restrict the access to, and dissemination of, information for commercial and other reasons without informing their users and in breach of the latters' rights. Due to the complex corporate and technical structures of such intermediaries, their often unclear corporate localisation and their co-operation with corporate partners in other countries, users may have difficulties in ensuring court jurisdiction in such cases.

10In order to protect freedom of expression and information on the Internet and online media, the Assembly calls on the member States of the Council of Europe to:

10.1ensure, in accordance with Article 10 of the Convention and the case law of the European Court of Human Rights, respect for freedom of expression and information on the Internet and online media by public as well as private entities, while respecting the protection of privacy and personal data;

10.2encourage intermediaries of ICT-based media to set up self-regulatory codes of conduct for the respect of their users' right to freedom of expression and information, and to create or join commercial associations with such codes of conduct and the power to implement them against non-compliant members;

10.3ensure that intermediaries of ICT-based media are transparent to the public and inform users of any measures which may impact their right to freedom of expression and information; such transparency may include the requirement to publicise corporate policies affecting the dissemination of, or access to, information and opinions;

10.4implement the Committee of Ministers Recommendation CM/Rec(2007)16 on measures to promote the public service value of the Internet; particular attention should be paid to the obligation not to refuse, provide in a discriminatory manner or terminate services to users without the right to do so;

10.5hold intermediaries of ICT-based media responsible for unlawful content, if they are the author of such content or have the obligation under national law to remove unlawful third-party content; particular emphasis should be paid to child pornography and content which incites racist and xenophobic discrimination, hatred, violence or terrorism;

10.6seek to ensure that intermediaries of ICT-based media can be held accountable for violations of their users' right to freedom of expression and information; this shall include ensuring the jurisdiction of domestic courts in case of violations, in accordance with Articles 10 and 13 of the Convention;

10.7review, if need be, the mandate of their national regulatory authorities for audiovisual media and telecommunications in order to reinforce freedom of expression and information on the Internet and online media in accordance with this resolution.

BDraft Recommendation

1Referring to its Resolution (2011) ... on the protection of freedom of expression and information on the Internet and online media, the Parliamentary Assembly recalls the Action Plan of the Warsaw Summit of 2005 which instructed the Council of Europe to elaborate principles and guidelines to ensure respect for human rights and the rule of law in the information society and to address challenges created by the use of information and communication technologies with a view to protecting human rights against violations stemming from the abuse of such technologies.

2The Assembly therefore recommends that the Committee of Ministers:

2.1take account of Resolution (2011) ... in its own work and forward it to the competent national ministries and regulatory authorities responsible for media based on information and communication technologies (ICTs);

2.2develop guidelines on domestic jurisdiction over, and the legal and corporate responsibility of, private companies which are intermediaries for ICT-based media, focusing such work in particular on the responsibility of intermediaries for the functioning of the Internet and online media and the respect for freedom of expression and information;

2.3co-operate with the European Commission and the European Union Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications (BEREC) to ensure a common application of Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ETS No. 5) and Article 11 of the European Union Charter of Fundamental Rights with regard to freedom of expression and information on ICT-based media;

2.4promote the signature and ratification of the Convention on Cybercrime (ETS No. 185) and its Additional Protocol concerning the criminalisation of acts of a racist and xenophobic nature committed through computer systems (ETS No. 189) by all member States as well as by non-member States and the European Union.

• Amendment 7

24 April 2012

Tabled by Mr Anvar MAKHMUTOV, Mr Valeriy SUDARENKOV, Mr Yury SOLONIN, Mr Anton BELYAKOV, Mr Alexander SIDYAKIN

Votes: 7 in favor 43 against 7 abstentions

In the draft recommendation, delete paragraph 2.4.

Explanatory note

Many States are considering drawing up a new document to replace the Council of Europe Convention on Cybercrime, which would be universal, take into account its positive experience and guarantee state sovereignty and non-interference in internal affairs of states.