Letter from Mr Drahoslav Štefánek, Ambassador of the Slovak Republic to the Council of Europe, to Mr Wojciech Sawicki, Secretary General of the Parliamentary Assembly, dated 18 September 2014
…
With reference to your letter of 9 July 2014 concerning the list of candidates for the post of judge of the European Court of Human Rights in respect of the Slovak Republic, we hereby submit the names and curricula vitae of the three candidates nominated by the Government of the Slovak Republic for the position of judge at the European Court of Human Rights.
The candidates on behalf of the Slovak Republic are as follows:
…
**********
Information on the national selection procedure for the position of a judge of the European Court of Human Rights
In the Slovak Republic the procedure of selection of the candidates for the position of judge of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the ECHR”) is regulated in detail by law which meets required international standards and, in particular, criteria enshrined in Article 21 of the European Convention on Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention”).
According to Article 141a § 4 d) of the Constitution of the Slovak Republic, it is under the authority of the Judicial Council of the Slovak Republic (hereinafter “the Judicial Council”) to submit to the Government of the Slovak Republic proposals of candidates for judges who should act in respect of the Slovak Republic in international judicial bodies.
Respecting this provision of the Constitution, when endorsing the selection of the candidates, the Government of the Slovak Republic may act only upon proposal submitted to it by the Judicial Council.
It is thus the Judicial Council which is vested by the Constitution with the functions of selecting the aforementioned candidates. The Judicial Council is the judiciary's highest body, independent from the legislative and executive power. This body consists of 18 members, almost all of them are serving judges.
When selecting candidates for the position of the judge at the ECHR in the current case, the Judicial Council performed its duties in accordance with national procedure provided for in Section 27g of the Act 185/2002 Coll. on the Judicial Council of the Slovak Republic as amended (hereinafter the “Act on Judicial Council”).
Section 27g § 1 of the Act on Judicial Council stipulates that the nomination for the election of the candidate for the position of a judge who should act in respect of the Slovak Republic in international judicial bodies, can be submitted to the Judicial Council by:
Requirements for the candidates for the position of the judge of the Slovak Republic in international judicial bodies are as follows:
Nomination for a judge who should act in respect of the Slovak Republic in an international judicial body, shall be submitted to the Judicial Council. For the nomination to be approved it has to obtain the majority of votes of all Judicial Council members in secret ballot.
Following the vote, the Judicial Council adopted Resolution No. 197 of 2 December 2013 approving the following candidates: Ms Andrea Krišková, Mr Ondrej Laciak and Ms Marica Pirošíková.
The Judicial Council subsequently submitted the nominations to the Government of the Slovak Republic, which endorsed the proposed list of candidates (Resolution No. 699 of 4 December 2013).
Name, forename: Krišková, Andrea
Sex: Female
Date of birth: 22 December 1972
Place of birth: Bratislava, Slovak Republic
Nationality: Slovak
Marital Status: Married
Other citizenship: None
Worked in one of the most successful American-based law firm worldwide. Provided legal service in all areas of law with special regard to commercial law, administrative law, legal counselling in land issues area and litigation in these areas.
Worked in one of the most successful English-based law firms worldwide, providing legal service in all areas of law
Commercial law focusing work. Drafted all kinds of legal agreements, legal advisory services in areas such as tax law, corporate, labour law, social security, customs, foreign exchange, stocks, stay of foreign expatriates in the Slovak Republic, the tax procedures, appeals against tax authority decisions, representation of clients on Supreme court as a highest court in dealing with an administrative decisions.
Implementation of international public law in Slovakia with special regard to refugee and asylum law. Dealing with administrative bodies such as Migration Office, Ministry of Interior and Police Authorities, District Police offices, Border Police, Headquarters of Police Forces of SR and implementation of Administrative law. Drafting claims and representation before the Supreme Court of the Slovak Republic and Constitutional Court of the Slovak Republic and appeals to the Ministry of Interior. Work with refugees in the field – visiting them in refugee camps and police custody.
Legal advisor in the field of minority rights with special regard to ethnic minority rights.
Research on the rights of stateless persons in the Slovak Republic. This research is a manual for stateless persons and the rights they enjoy (or lack) in Slovakia according to legal status, employment, education, marriage, health and the other areas of legal and social life. This research was made for UNHCR in English.
The brochure “The rights of stateless persons in the Slovak Republic” – manual for stateless persons and the rights they enjoy (or lack) in Slovakia according to legal status, employment, education, marriage, health and the other areas of legal and social life.
|
Language |
Reading |
Writing |
Speaking |
|||||||
|
very good |
good |
fair |
very good |
good |
fair |
very good |
good |
fair |
||
|
First language: Slovak |
X |
X |
X |
|||||||
|
English |
X |
X |
X |
|||||||
|
French |
X |
X |
X |
|||||||
|
Russian |
X |
X |
X |
|||||||
|
Czech |
X |
X |
X |
|||||||
N/A.
I certify that all information stated in this resume is true and complete to the best of my knowledge.
Bratislava, 14 October 2013
Name: Laciak
Forename: Ondrej
Sex: Male
Date and place of birth: 2 August 1980, Bratislava
Nationality: Slovak Republic
N/A.
Advisory Board member of the European Criminal Bar Association (ECBA), whose primary aim and objective is to be a leading group of independent criminal defense lawyers in Council of Europe member countries promoting the fundamental rights of persons under criminal investigation, suspects, accused and convicted persons.
Member of the Legal Expert Advisory Panel (LEAP) of the Fair Trials International. The aim of the Fair Trials International is the protection of fair trial rights and to defend the rights of people facing criminal charges in a country other than their own.
None.
N/A.
Some notes about criminal law in the Slovak Republic (Shizuoka law journal, No. 4, Japan, March 2012)
Trafficking in human beings in the context of regulatory Council of Europe in correlation criminal justice of the Slovak Republic (international conference – Law as a unifying factor of Europe – jurisprudence and practice, section the Role of National Criminal Law in the European Union Area, Comenius University, Faculty of Law, 2010)
Rights of suspects in the Slovak Republic (ECBA conference in the University of Nicosia, Cyprus, 2011)
Right to information in Slovak criminal procedure. (International conference – Communication as a measure of protection and limitation of human rights. Information in relation to human rights, Bratislava, Comenius University, Faculty of Law, 2013)
|
Language |
Reading |
Writing |
Speaking |
||||||
|
very good |
good |
fair |
very good |
good |
fair |
very good |
good |
fair |
|
|
a. First language: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
– Slovak |
X |
X |
X |
||||||
|
b. Official languages: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
– English |
X |
X |
X |
||||||
|
– French |
|||||||||
|
c. Other languages: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
– Czech |
X |
X |
X |
||||||
|
– German |
X |
X |
X |
||||||
I confirm my intention to follow intensive language classes of the French language prior to, and if need be also at the beginning of a term of duty if elected a judge on the Court
N/A.
I confirm that I will take up permanent residence in Strasbourg if elected a judge on the Court.
Name, forename: Pirošíková, Marica
Sex: Female
Date and place of birth: 23 September 1976, Banská Bystrica (Slovak Republic)
Nationality: Slovak
Commentary on the selected Articles of the Convention on the Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, 2007
Case-law of the European Court of Human Rights on the selected Articles of the Convention on the Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, 2001
Advocate before the European Courts, 2004
French–Slovak, Slovak–French Legal Dictionary, 2005
General Administrative Law, 2007
Human Rights – selected decisions of the European Court of Human Rights and Court of the European Communities, 2008 (updated 2012)
Tendencies concerning the application of Article 6 (1) of the Convention in the disputes involving public authorities, Judicial Revue 2002
Discontinuation of the criminal proceedings, reduction of sentence due to the delays in the proceedings, Judicial Revue 2003
Interpretation of certain domestic Acts in the light of the guarantees contained in Article 5 of the Convention, Judicial Revue 2003
The Auschwitz Lie, Judicial Revue 2004
Effectiveness of domestic remedies in the view of the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights, Judicial Revue 2004
Protection of personality rights, Act No. 58/1969 Coll. and their interpretation in accordance with the guarantees of Article 5 of the Convention, Judicial Revue 2005
The amount of the just satisfaction awarded at national level for delays in the proceedings in the light of the recent case-law of the European Court of Human Rights, Judicial Revue 2005
Execution of the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights by re-opening the proceedings, Judicial Revue 2005
Rights of the victim of a criminal offence in the light of the European Court of Human Rights’ case-law, Judicial Revue 2005
The right of an accused to consult the file in connection with the decision on custody given in the pre-trial proceedings, Judicial Revue 2007
Constitutional complaint and the right to a hearing within a reasonable time, Judicial Revue 2008
The right to life and protection of personality rights action, Judicial Revue 2009
The current decisions of the European Court of Human Rights concerning protection of property, Bulletin of Slovak Advocacy 2011
The case-law of the Constitutional Court of the Slovak Republic from the European Court of Human Rights’ view, Bulletin of Slovak Advocacy 2012
The actual case-law of the European Court of Human Rights concerning the application of Article 6 (1) of the Convention, Bulletin of Slovak Advocacy 2012
Rights of the victim of a criminal offence in the light of the European Court of Human Rights’ current case-law, From Judicial Practise 2013
|
Language |
Reading |
Writing |
Speaking |
||||||
|
very good |
good |
fair |
very good |
good |
fair |
very good |
good |
fair |
|
|
a. First language: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
– Slovak |
X |
X |
X |
||||||
|
b. Official languages: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
– English |
X |
X |
X |
||||||
|
– French |
X |
X |
X |
||||||
In the event that I do not meet the level of language proficiency required for the post of judge in an official language [the second], I confirm my intention to follow intensive language classes of the language concerned prior to, and if need be also at the beginning of, my term of duty if elected a judge on the Court.
I confirm my intention to take up permanent residence in Strasbourg if elected a judge on the Court.
Bratislava, 8 November 2013