Follow-up to the reform of the Council of Europe
Reply to Recommendation
| Doc. 12835
| 23 January 2012
- Author(s):
- Committee of Ministers
- Origin
- Adopted
at the 1131st meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies (18 January 2012). 2012 - First part-session
- Reply to Recommendation
- : Recommendation 1951
(2011)
- Thesaurus
1. The Committee of Ministers has carefully
examined
Recommendation
1951 (2011) of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe
on “Follow-up to the reform of the Council of Europe”. It shares
the Parliamentary Assembly’s attachment to a politically relevant
and effective Council of Europe and its support for the reform initiated
by the Secretary General. It appreciates the Parliamentary Assembly’s
proposals to this end. It also welcomes the Parliamentary Assembly’s
initiative of launching its own reform process in order to strengthen
its political relevance and effectiveness.
2. The Committee of Ministers has taken note of the Parliamentary
Assembly’s wish to launch a debate on the need for a Council of
Europe Summit in order to give the Organisation fresh political
impetus (paragraph 2.1 of the recommendation). On this subject,
the Committee of Ministers recalls that the reform of the Organisation
is above all a political reform, which has focused on strategic
changes and has put in place the appropriate governance tools for
these changes to be feasible; all these actions are contributing
to improve the place of the Council of Europe in the European architecture.
The 121st Session of the Committee of Ministers (Istanbul, 10-11
May 2011) firmly backed the reform of the Organisation and the efforts
to optimise its political potential in the interests of European
citizens. On this occasion, the Committee of Ministers agreed to
take stock of the progress in the Organisation’s reform process
at its next Session. It would therefore seem appropriate to await
the first results of the reform process before considering convening
a Council of Europe Summit.
3. The other proposals set out in paragraphs 2.2 to 2.6 of the
recommendation have been taken into account in the framework of
the Secretary General’s proposed reforms. We should mention in this
context the new structure of the intergovernmental committees
Note approved by the Committee of Ministers
in April 2011, that of the Secretariat approved in June 2011, the
June 2011 Resolution on Council of Europe conferences of specialised
ministers
Note, and the action taken
to set up a Strasbourg Democracy Forum. Furthermore, as regards synergy
among policy makers, citizens and civil society, the Secretary General
has provided a number of pointers
Note to revitalise Council of Europe co-operation
with civil society. He will be making proposals for follow-up, which
will be considered by the Committee of Ministers at one of its forthcoming
meetings. All these measures, together with other reform actions
such as the ongoing reform of the European Court of Human Rights
or the reform of the external presence, are intended to reinforce
the Organisation’s coherency and impact.
4. In connection with allowing the specialised ministries to
contribute to the financing of certain Council of Europe activities
(paragraph 2.7 of the recommendation), the Committee of Ministers
recalls that the member States are responsible for the financing
of the Organisation’s activities. Each government is therefore free
to decide whether or not its specialised ministries contribute to
the financing of any of the Organisation’s activities, notably by
means of voluntary contributions or under partial agreements. As
for the choice of priorities for Council of Europe intergovernmental
action, the Committee of Ministers recognises the high level input
of specialised ministries, even though this remains a prerogative
of the Committee of Ministers.
5. In line with the proposal set out in paragraph 2.8 of the
recommendation and in the framework of the discussions on the Programme
and Budget 2012-2013 of the Organisation, which was adopted on 24 November
2011, the Secretary General made additional proposals reallocating
new savings made to priority programme lines.
6. Lastly, the exchange of views on 12 January 2012 between the
Committee of Ministers’ Working Party on Institutional Reforms (GT-REF.INST)
and Mr Jean-Claude Mignon (Rapporteur on the follow-up to the reform
of the Council of Europe), Mr Egidijus Vareikis (Chair of the Assembly’s
Committee on Rules of Procedure) and Mr Serhiy Holovaty (Rapporteur
on the follow-up by the Committee of Ministers to the work of the
Parliamentary Assembly) represents a further positive development
in strengthening working relations between the two bodies.