Appendix 2 to the reply
Comments of the European Committee on
Legal Co operation (CDCJ)
1 Following the adoption by Parliamentary Assembly,
on the occasion of its Standing Committee (Paris, 12 March 2010),
of
Recommendation 1905
(2010) on “Children who witness domestic violence”, the Committee
of Ministers
Note decided to send this
recommendation to the European Committee on Legal Co‑operation (CDCJ)
for information and possible comments by 30 June 2010.
2 The Bureau of the CDCJ took note of the Parliamentary Assembly
recommendation and decided to comment, within the deadline set by
the Committee of Ministers, on domains which are of particular interest
to the CDCJ.
3 The Bureau of the CDCJ welcomes the recommendation as a whole
and, to begin with, wishes to draw the attention of the Committee
of Ministers to the CDCJ’s 2008 report on non‑criminal remedies
for crime victims,
Note in particular to its chapter
3 which deals with vulnerable victims including children and victims
of domestic violence. In this chapter, it is recalled that
Resolution No. 2 on child‑friendly justice adopted at the 28th Council
of Europe Conference of Ministers of Justice (Lanzarote, 2007) states
that “special attention and guarantees are required for child victims
or witnesses of crime to protect their welfare”, and that this is
in line with the United Nations Guidelines on justice in matters
involving child victims and witnesses of crime
Note which are specifically aimed at
ensuring that children who have been harmed by crime or who have
witnessed crimes are protected and treated fairly in courts.
4 More references to witnesses are to be found in the report
(see in particular in paragraphs 143 to 147 which address the specific
needs of protection for victims and witnesses subject to intimidation),
as well as examples of good practice (see in particular paragraph
228 presenting the Swedish system where “a child who witnessed a
crime without being considered as a victim stricto
sensu will thus be entitled to compensation if this crime
harmed the safety, confidence or trust of the child”).
5 The Bureau of the CDCJ furthermore welcomes the invitation
made to the Committee of Ministers in paragraph 2 of the recommendation
to instruct the Ad hoc Committee on Preventing and Combating Violence against
Women and Domestic Violence (CAHVIO) to give particular attention
to the situation of children witnesses of domestic violence who
should be considered as secondary victims. On 31 March 2010, the Bureau
of the CDCJ submitted its observations on the draft Convention on
preventing and combating violence against women and domestic violence.
In paragraph 8 of these observations, the Bureau of the CDCJ reaffirmed
its proposal that the scope of the convention encompass not only
women but also boys and girls victims and witnesses of domestic
violence.
NoteNoteNote The CDCJ participates
actively in the meetings of the CAHVIO as an observer.
6 In that respect, the Bureau of the CDCJ recalls
Resolution No. 1 on preventing and responding to domestic violence adopted
at the 29th Council of Europe Conference of Ministers of Justice
(Tromsø, 2009) and inviting the Committee of Ministers to entrust
the CDCJ in co‑operation with other committees
Note and, in the light of the results
of the work by the CAHVIO, “to examine, taking into account the
need to protect both the rights of victims and those of perpetrators:
a forms of domestic violence directed
in particular against children and the elderly, and propose responses to
them;
b challenges faced by victims of domestic violence and propose
targeted solutions to increase their protection and reduce their
vulnerability;
c the effectiveness of existing civil and administrative
legal remedies and measures and propose further ones aimed at preventing
domestic violence or responding to it”.
7 When the work of the CAHVIO is completed and the time is ripe
for the CDCJ to reflect on the follow‑up to be given to
Resolution No. 1 in this light, the Bureau of the CDCJ shall also bear
in mind Parliamentary Assembly
Recommendation 1905 (2010) and thereby consider the situation of children witnesses
of domestic violence.
8 Finally, following the invitation made in its paragraph 3.1,
the recommendation was brought to the attention of the Group of
Specialists on Child-Friendly Justice (CJ‑S‑CH) which, at its last
meeting (Strasbourg, 25‑28 May 2010), took note of it and took it
into consideration when finalising the draft Council of Europe Guidelines
on child‑friendly justice.
Note
9 The final draft of the Council of Europe Guidelines on child-friendly
justice recall the aforementioned United Nations Guidelines on justice
in matters involving child victims and witnesses of crime, and entail specific
provisions concerning child witnesses, including children witnesses
of domestic violence.
10 In addition, one of the objectives of the Council of Europe
Guidelines is to prevent secondary victimisation arising from giving
evidence or testimony. The draft text foresees practical measures
and presents examples of good practice to prevent children and young
people from the harshness of the justice systems, in particular
the traumatising effects of repeated interviews and testimonies.
The draft text presents in its explanatory memorandum the children’s’
houses in Iceland and Sweden as an example of good practice in this
area. Children are interviewed by trained professionals within
a safe child‑friendly environment where they can receive all the
protection, psychological and medical care that they may need, under
one roof. This avoids having to repeat several times what has happened
to them before different people, in different institutions, and
in different locations over a long period of time. It is important
for the police, social services and courts to work together in raising
awareness and ensuring that children do not have to go through a
second trauma that can be worse than what they have already experienced.