7.1 inform the CCR that it is legally not
feasible to reform the co-ordinated pension scheme by reducing the benefits
provided for staff, since the possibility of modifying benefits was
intentionally ruled out by the authors of the Pension Scheme Rules, as is
confirmed by a study of the travaux préparatoires of the 94th Report of the
Co-ordinating Committee of Government Budget Experts (CCG) which set up the
pension scheme;
7.2 also inform the CCR that its intention to introduce these amendments
is based exclusively on the improvidence of governments in the face of the
predictable and predicted costs of the scheme, and that this basis has nothing
to do with the smooth functioning of the organisations;
7.3 engage with the staff, who remain deprived of a genuine right of
negotiation in the co-ordinated context, in a dialogue to identify the few
anomalies and imperfections of the pension scheme which could be rectified in
agreement with staff representatives;
7.4 bear in mind the negative consequences for social peace in the
Organisation which could result from a reduction in benefits promised to
staff;
7.5 with regard to pay, comply with the rule formulated by the Council of
Europe’s Administrative Tribunal in 1994 according to which “methods adopted in
this important matter [adjustment of Council of Europe staff remuneration]
require to be highly transparent so as to avert suspicion or mistrust, which
cannot but damage the climate of mutual understanding and full co-operation
necessary in an international organisation like the Council of
Europe”;
7.6 recommend to the CCR, to this end, that it propose for all the five
co-ordinated organisations, salary adjustment methods which are objective and
mathematical and take full account, as is the case with the so-called
“parallelism” rule, of budgetary policies adopted at national level;
7.7 observe the principles of equal opportunities and fair geographical
distribution in its recruitment policy;
7.8 ensure that the Organisation can rely at all times on a competent and
independent staff, which implies being able both to recruit and to retain
staff; to this end, Council of Europe staff remuneration must remain
competitive with regard to the three recruitment markets named in the method
currently in force (private sector; national civil services, including
expatriated civil servants; the international civil service, including the
European Union).