Europe’s social dimension: full implementation of the revised European Social Charter and evaluation of new labour regulations and minimum wages
- Parliamentary Assembly
- Assembly debate on 26 June 2007 (21st Sitting) (see Doc. 11277, report of the Social, Health and Family Affairs Committee, rapporteur: Mr Riester; and Doc. 11317, opinion of the Committee on Economic Affairs and Development, rapporteur: Mr Bjørnstad). Text adopted by the Assembly on 26June 2007 (21st Sitting).
1 Fifty years after the signing of the Treaty of Rome, we are still confronted with the task of uniting
Europe in social terms. Its countries have successfully overcome many of the challenges they faced in
the wake of the Second World War, but they still face many more today, particularly in the field of
social security. Global competition, the impact of new technologies and ageing of the population are
shaping the political agenda. Various basic problems, such as poor economic growth, high
unemployment and growing inequalities, must be tackled without delay.
2 In all the Council of Europe’s member states, reform processes are under way aimed at developing
and guaranteeing employment, providing legal and social protection for individuals, developing
education and health systems, and providing protection against discrimination. The Parliamentary
Assembly is convinced that only a comprehensive change of direction in social policy can overcome
the growing inequalities in social security at European level. Economic and labour market reforms
must contribute to social cohesion and, conversely, social policy must seek to promote growth and
3 Reform efforts cannot focus on economic aspects alone but must also take account of social issues.
The only way of making a success of European integration and of globalisation is to give economic
and social aspects equal attention.
4 Against this background, the Assembly insists on the need for reforms which create a better
balance between flexibility and security on the labour market – the so-called flexicurity approach. It
welcomes the efforts to achieve a consensus between policy makers, employers and employees on
striking a balance between market requirements and social protection for workers. If Europe really
wants to meet these challenges effectively, it must adopt a global approach which combines an active
labour market policy, flexible contractual arrangements and social security, emphasises the primary
importance of training and qualifications in this context, and seeks to prevent any further decline in
5 The Assembly points out that, in nearly all areas of reform, the revised European Social Charter (ETS N°. 163) contains provisions which most of the member states accept. Yet the general public
and political decision makers are insufficiently aware of its content. The rights it enshrines must be
publicised more widely and feed into the process of creating a social Europe.
6 State social provision has developed very differently in the various countries of Europe, which is
why their social security standards are also very different. Reforms are normally seen from a national
standpoint only, and discussed without reference to the European dimension. Yet the Charter offers
ready-made solutions to many of the problems faced by the reformers. The Assembly accordingly
calls on member states to ensure that the Charter’s relevant key elements are incorporated in future
national reforms, with a view to giving them a European character.
7 The Assembly proposes that regular social policy debates be held in support of the member states’
efforts to give the Charter a more prominent role when social policy instruments are being prepared
in an enlarged Europe. These debates can provide a platform for discussing deficits, and also
highlighting best practices. In this way, national reform processes could be co-ordinated and
coherently brought together with a view to creating a joint European social dimension.
8 The Charter itself, however, does not address certain essential matters, including the increasing
freedom of movement for workers, freedom of establishment and freedom to provide services, for
which new regulations must be drawn up. This liberalisation is generally seen as a good thing but
divergent social standards are becoming a cause of public concern. The anxiety that these questions
give rise to in society and the fact that the political authorities have so far been unable to allay this
feeling, show that European countries are still insufficiently prepared in this area. Hence the vital
need to extend the revised European Social Charter to cover them and define aims and limits which
are important in shaping these processes of liberalisation.
9 The Assembly proposes that the Sub-Committee on the European Social Charter and Employment,
in collaboration with the European Committee of Social Rights, broaden the scope of the Charter by
drafting guidelines to supplement the text, embodying minimum standards to govern opening of the
labour, service and location markets.
10 The Assembly is convinced that only a “social reality” which is perceived as an appreciable and
sustainable improvement to the daily lives of Europeans can convince them of the need for and
benefits of European unification and the revised European Social Charter. The Council of Europe’s
member states must turn social rights into a political process.
11 The Assembly also believes that Europe must take more account of global developments, and
look beyond its own frontiers. It calls on the member states to globalise the European debate and try
harder to find ways of improving and promoting social standards in other countries too, thus helping
to give globalisation itself a social dimension.
12 Against this background, the Assembly believes that it is urgently necessary for the Council of
Europe and the European Union to look beyond their respective borders and work more intensively
with other multilateral organisations on giving globalisation a social dimension and setting a
European social model against the global “race to the bottom” trend in social standards. In view of its expertise in the social security field – and particularly its Decent Work Agenda of 1999 – the
International Labour Organization would be an ideal partner here.