Legal aspects of "autonomous" vehicles
Reply to Recommendation
| Doc. 15341
| 02 July 2021
- Author(s):
- Committee of Ministers
- Origin
- Adopted at the 1408th meeting
of the Ministers’ Deputies (30 June 2021). 2021 - Fourth part-session
- Reply to Recommendation
- : Recommendation 2187
(2020)
1. The Committee of Ministers has examined
Parliamentary Assembly
Recommendation
2187 (2020) on “Legal aspects of “autonomous” vehicles”
and has forwarded it to the Ad hoc Committee on Artificial Intelligence
(CAHAI) and to the European Committee on Crime Problems (CDPC) for
information and comments.
2. The Committee of Ministers fully shares the concerns of the
Assembly as set out in its
Resolution
2346 (2020) and agrees that automated driving systems
or fully autonomous vehicles relying on artificial intelligence (AI)
systems have a serious potential impact on the effective enjoyment
of numerous human rights. They also give rise to a variety of novel
challenges for regulatory regimes, in particular in relation to
criminal and civil liability.
3. The Committee of Ministers recently took note of the CAHAI’s
feasibility study on a legal framework for the development, design
and application of artificial intelligence, based on Council of
Europe standards on human rights, democracy and the rule of law.
The study notes that the services and products referred to as “artificial
intelligence” have the potential to promote human prosperity and
individual and societal well-being by enhancing progress and innovation,
but at the same time concerns are rising in respect of the negative
impacts resulting from different types of AI applications on human
beings and society. It concludes that an appropriate legal framework
would likely consist of a combination of binding and non-binding
legal instruments that complement each other. The Committee of Ministers
instructed the CAHAI to focus its work on the elaboration of specific
elements of an appropriate legal framework, which could include
a binding legal instrument, as well as non-binding instruments,
as appropriate. The results are expected towards the end of the
year.
4. It is recalled that the CDPC held a thematic session on AI
and criminal liability in 2018 where the scope and substance of
relevant national criminal laws and international law pertaining
to the use of automated vehicles were addressed. After completing
a feasibility study identifying the scope and the main elements
of a future Council of Europe instrument on AI and criminal law,
the CDPC decided, in November 2020, that a working group should
be set up to draft an instrument on AI and criminal law that would
focus on harm caused by automated vehicles. Specifically, this instrument
should provide a means of dealing efficiently and consistently with
the issue of criminal responsibility, as well as ensuring and promoting
greater international co-operation and respect for fundamental rights
in this area.
5. Therefore, feasibility studies have already been completed
by two intergovernmental committees pointing to the need for a legal
framework for artificial intelligence in general and in the specific
area of autonomous vehicles. The Committee of Ministers will decide
on the follow-up to be given to this work in the coming months in
the context of its examination of the next Programme and Budget.
In view of any possible future work in the CDPC, it encourages this
committee to bear in mind the particular concerns of the Parliamentary
Assembly as regards the criminal law implications of the development
and introduction of autonomous vehicles and their regulation in
accordance with Council of Europe standards on human rights and the
rule of law, including respect for the right to life and the principle
of legal certainty.