Acting on the basis of Article 22 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamentail Freedoms, I have the honour to submit a list of three candidates for the post of judge of the European Court of Human Rights in respect of Poland for the term of office 2021-2030 (in alphabetic order):
As requested per letter dated 21 February 2021, attached hereby are the curricula vitae of the candidates in both English and French, prepared in accordance with the model adopted by the Parliamentary Assembly, as well as a detailed information on the national procedure by which the candidates were selected.
I would also like to confirm that the Advisory Panel of Experts on Candidates for Election for Judge to the European Court of Human Rights was consulted on 8 December 2020 as envisaged by the Committee of Ministers’ Resolution No. CM/Res (2010) 26 of 10 November 2010.
At the same time, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Poland remains at your disposal should the Parliamentary Assembly have any questions concerning the above candidates or the selection procedure applied.
The procedure, by which three candidates were selected, was conducted on the basis of Ordinance No. 1 of the Minister of Foreign Affairs of 13 January 2012 on the establishment of the Committee responsible for the selection of candidates for the post of Judge at the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg (Journal of Laws of the Minister of Foreign Affairs of 2012, item 1 and of 2020, item 55) (hereinafter referred to as the “Ordinance”). Thus, the same selection procedure was applied as in 2012 on the occasion of the previous selection and election of the current Polish judge of the European Court of Human Rights. Essentially, no changes in the procedure were made, bearing in mind that it was accepted by the Parliamentary Assembly in 2012. However, some important improvements were introduced.
The composition of the Committee responsible for the selection of candidates for the post of Judge at the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg (hereinafter referred to as the “Selection Committee”) was established basically in the same way as the composition of that body in 2012 during the previous selection process. The members of the Selection Committee were proposed by the Ministers of Foreign Affairs and Justice, the President of the General Counsel to the Republic of Poland and the Head of the Chancellery of the Prime Minister, i.e. exactly the same authorities which had nominated members of the Selection Committee in 2012.
However, in response to the suggestions on the part of some NGOs and representatives of legal professions, the participation of a person from outside the government administration – a professor of the University of Opole (dean and lecturer of the Faculty of Law and Administration) – was secured as an additional guarantee of the appropriate conduct of the selection process – free from undue influence. This was made possible thanks to the amendment introduced to the 2012 Ordinance. As a result of that amendment, instead of an undersecretary of state at the Ministry of Justice and the president of the General Counsel to the Republic of Poland, the new regulation enabled the appointment of two additional professors and specialists in the issues relevant to the Convention system.
The Selection Committee was headed by the secretary of state at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in charge of human rights, legal and treaty, consular and parliamentary matters (at the same time assistant professor at the Institute of European Studies at the Warsaw University’s Faculty of Journalism and Political Science). The remaining 6 members included:
In sum, the Selection Committee was thus of a balanced composition as it involved two representatives of the government, four members of the civil service (not linked to any political parties) and one independent representative of academia. As far as the professional profile of the members of the Selection Committee is concerned, four out of six persons have links with the academic community (two of them are actively involved in teaching human rights, constitutional law and international law at the universities of Opole and Toruń respectively). The members of the body responsible for recommending candidates had similar high professional standing and collectively ensured sufficient technical knowledge of the relevant issues, notably: human rights law, public international law, constitutional law, humanitarian law, political sciences, domestic law, the functioning of the European Court of Human Rights and other international tribunals and the work of the Council of Europe as well as practical experience in dispute settlement. Members of the Selection Committee also ensured good command of both English and French. All members of the Committee (except its secretary) were able to actively participate in the deliberations of the Committee and on equal footing.
On 9 October 2020, the launch of the procedure for selecting candidates for the post of judge was announced by the Minister of Foreign Affairs in three daily newspapers of a nationwide coverage, including the Dziennik Gazeta Prawna (Daily Legal Newspaper), and a four-week deadline was fixed for submitting applications (expiring on 6 November 2020). The announcement, specifying the formal and substantive requirements to be met by the candidates, was also placed on the Ministry of Foreign Affairs’ website and its social media accounts (Twitter, LinkedIn). At the same time, the Deputy Foreign Minister also sent a letter to 130 institutions asking them to disseminate the announcement further. In addition to the relevant governmental authorities and the Chancelleries of the President, Sejm and Senate of the Republic of Poland, the request for dissemination of the advertisement was also addressed to all three ombudsmen functioning in Poland (i.e. the Commissioner for Human Rights, Children’s Rights Ombudsman, Patient’s Rights Ombudsman), the Constitutional Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Administrative Court and the National Council of the Judiciary, the presidents of all courts of appeal and all voivodeship administrative courts, the presidents of the relevant legal professions: The Polish Bar Council, National Bar Council of Attorneys-at-Law and the National Council of Court Bailiffs, and also to the chairpersons of the human rights commissions of advocates and attorneys-at-law. The request was also sent to several non-governmental organisations, including those critical to the government (namely those that co-operate on a permanent basis with the interministerial Committee for matters of the European Court of Human Rights), the deans of the faculties of law of 18 universities throughout the country, the Polish Academy of Sciences, as well as 16 Regional Centres for International Debate.
In total, 18 persons submitted their candidatures before the expiry of the time-limit. In accordance with the above-mentioned Ordinance, prior to the examination of their applications at the first meeting, the members of the Selection Committee were required to declare a potential conflict of interests between them and any of the candidates (no such conflict of interest was identified). Eight applying persons were called upon by the Selection Committee to remove formal shortcomings of their applications (all of them complied). There was no shortlisting and all applicants were invited for interviews held at the second meeting (except three persons who had withdrawn their candidatures shortly before the meeting).
All interviews were held on 1 and 2 December 2020 according to the same rules fixed by the Selection Committee at its first meeting in November 2020. Those rules were announced to all candidates in advance and were published on-line. The interviews were conducted in alphabetical order and the time afforded to each candidate was identical (40 minutes). The interviews were based on a standardised format, similar to that applied by the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe. At the beginning, all candidates were given an opportunity to present their candidatures as well as to share their vision of the role of judge and that of the Convention and the Court. Subsequently, all candidates received the same set of four questions – all of which dealt with the Convention system and the Court’s case-law. The final list of questions was adopted by the Selection Committee at the second meeting just before the interviews. One of the questions was posed in English, and one in French, the candidates having the right to reply in any official language of the Court. Following these interviews and deliberations, the Selection Committee took a final decision on the list of three candidates.
According to the Ordinance, the members of the Selection Committee should assess the candidates taking into account the requirements of holding the office of judge at the European Court of Human Rights as set out in Article 21(1) of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, as well as:
The Ordinance also requires that the list of three successful candidates should include at least one representative of each sex (unless in view of exceptional circumstances it would not be possible).
The members of the Selection Committee were made fully aware of the requirements concerning the list of three candidates and of the standards applied by the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe and the Advisory Panel when assessing the lists and candidates put forward by governments. Each member of the Selection Committee received – translated into Polish – the memorandum of the Parliamentary Assembly on the procedure for the election of judges to the European Court of Human Rights and the Short guide on the Panel’s role and the minimum qualifications required of a candidate. They also received a complete set of all the Council of Europe relevant documents (inter alia the text of the Convention, Committee of Ministers Guidelines with explanatory memorandum, Parliamentary Assembly Resolution 1646 (2009) on the nomination of candidates and election of judges to the European Court of Human Rights), as well as subsidiary materials such as, among others, information on the legal requirements necessary in Poland to be appointed for the post of judge of the Supreme Court, the Supreme Administrative Court and the Constitutional Court and an overview of the Polish jurisprudence and doctrine regarding the term of the “highest moral level”, as well as excerpts from one of the leading commentaries to Article 21 of the Convention. The checklists containing the criteria stemming from the Convention, Ordinance and the Parliamentary Assembly checklists were also made available to the members of the Selection Committee as a tool facilitating their work.
Throughout the whole selection process, a special care was taken to ensure its transparency. Not only was the announcement widely disseminated, but the Ministry of Foreign Affairs also launched a dedicated website (https://www.gov.pl/web/dyplomacja/wybor-sedziego-etpc) where it published news on the respective stages of the selection process, including information on persons appointed to sit as members of the Selection Committee, detailed information on both meetings of the Selection Committee, the rules of conducting interviews with candidates, and – after the interviews – the exact questions posed to the candidates. All relevant domestic legal regulations and documents of the Council of Europe could also be found on that website (among them the aforementioned memorandum of the Parliamentary Assembly and the Panel’s short guide in Polish; the text of Parliamentary Assembly Resolution 1646 (2009) on the nomination of candidates and election of judges to the European Court of Human Rights; the applicable extract from the Rules of the Parliamentary Assembly on Elections by the Parliamentary Assembly; Committee of Ministers Resolutions nos. CM/Res(2009)5 on the status and conditions of service of judges of the European Court of Human Rights and of the Commissioner for Human Rights and CM/Res(2010)26 on the establishment of an Advisory Panel of Experts on Candidates for Election as Judge to the European Court of Human Rights; Guidelines of the Committee of Ministers on the selection of candidates for the post of judge at the European Court of Human Rights as well as two relevant CDDH reports). All necessary documents and forms for the candidates were also made available in one place to facilitate applying. In addition, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs replied to many individual requests for information or documents on the selection process, including the protocols of all meetings of the Selection Committee were made available to two parliamentarians upon their request (in full versions with all annexes – once the personal data of candidates had been anonymised as required by the binding regulations on the personal data protection).
The only information that was not made public was the information on the names of all applying persons and their CVs, in accordance with the rules adopted as early as 2012 during the previous selection process. It was decided not to introduce exceptions to the general rule of protection of personal data bearing in mind the following arguments and standards: the content of paragraphs V.2-3 of the Committee of Ministers Guidelines, which do not contain any recommendation to publish personal data of all applying persons, the practice applied by many other Council of Europe member States, and the concerns expressed in two CDDH reports where the publication of personal data of all applying persons was mentioned as a challenge that could possibly discourage potential applicants. Nevertheless, the Selection Committee sent a message to all applying persons informing them about the interest expressed by some NGOs, media and parliamentarians in receiving information on the persons who had applied. In November 2020, the Selection Committee asked the candidates to consider publishing information on their participation in the selection procedure voluntarily and a special form was made available to them to that end. In response, two persons consented and their personal details were made public.
Name, forename: Karska, Elżbieta
Sex: Female
Date and place of birth: 13 September 1977, Wrocław, Poland
Nationality: Polish
Not applicable
I do not hold and have never held or run for elected posts.
I am not and have never been a member of a political party or political movement, and so I can confirm that I do not hold and have never held any positions in such organisations.
International Relations.
2020-present.
Member of the Committee of the Award of the Polish Association for International Studies.
Author of over 100 publications (monographs, articles and other works in Polish, English and other languages) on international law, including human rights law. List of selected publications:
|
Language |
Reading |
Writing |
Speaking |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
very good |
good |
fair |
very good |
good |
Fair |
very good |
good |
fair |
|
|
a. First language: |
|||||||||
|
Polish |
X |
X |
X |
||||||
|
b.Official languages: |
|||||||||
|
– English |
X |
X |
X |
||||||
|
– French |
X |
X |
X |
||||||
|
c.Other languages: |
|||||||||
|
Russian |
X |
X |
X |
||||||
|
German |
X |
X |
X |
||||||
I can confirm my intention to participate in intensive French language classes prior to and, if necessary, also at the beginning of my term of duty, if I were to be elected a judge on the Court.
I confirm my readiness to take up permanent residence in Strasbourg, if I were to be elected a judge on the Court.
Name, forename: STĘPKOWSKI Aleksander Bogusław
Sex: Male
Date and place of birth: 20 May 1974, London, United Kingdom
Nationality: polish
Judge of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Poland (current, since 2019). I have been adjudicating in the Chamber of Extraordinary Control and Public Affairs within which constitutional review of final judgments delivered by common courts is provided. This review is supplementing constitutional complaint as administered by the Constitutional Tribunal in relation to statutory provisions.
In the course of the extraordinary constitutional review I determine whether final judgments of common courts are conformant to fundamental constitutional rights and principles. In cases I NsNc 22/20 and I NsNc 57/20, as the judge rapporteur, I have provided a complex analysis reviewing conformity of extraordinary constitutional review with the ECtHR principles protecting legal certainty (protection of the res iudicata principle) upon Article 6 of the ECHR.
I have been also adjudicating as judge providing cassatory control over decisions of public regulators in matters including i.a. consumer protection, transport regulations, energy market, media market and others.
I have been also considering cases for excessive length of the proceedings in appellate jurisdiction, applying standards of the ECHR in this respect, as implemented into Polish legislation.
An other important field of judicial activity is review of the resolutions taken by the National Council for Judiciary, including presentation for the appointment to the office of judge.
I have been adjudicating also in electoral complaints (so called: “election protests”) raised in the national parliamentary elections, as well as elections to the European Parliament in 2019 and elections of the President of the Republic of Poland in 2020.
Professor of Law at the University of Warsaw, Faculty of Law and Administration.
None
None.
None.
Communication.
Since 26th May 2020.
Spokesperson of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Poland (current)
|
Language |
Reading |
Writing |
Speaking |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
very good |
good |
fair |
very good |
good |
fair |
very good |
good |
fair |
|
|
a. First language: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Polish |
X |
X |
X |
||||||
|
b. Official languages: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
– English |
X |
X |
X |
||||||
|
– French |
X |
X |
X |
||||||
|
c. Other languages: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Russian |
X |
X |
X |
||||||
|
German |
X |
X |
X |
||||||
I believe that my knowledge of French is fair enough for performing judicial activity. I was working in French while preparing publication of my doctoral thesis (L’institution du trust dans le système mixte du droit privé écossais) as well as analyzing case law of the Conseil d’Etat and Conseil Constitutionnel while preparing my habilitation on the Principle of Proportionality. I was also i.a. invited speaker by the (then) Advocate General of the CJEU Melchior Wathelet during the Grande Conférence Européenne Jean Rey (Université de Liège 28.10.2016) delivering presentation: La Situation juridique en Pologne dans un contexte Européen.
However, I do confirm that I am going to further improve my French during intensive language course prior to the beginning of the term of my duty, if elected judge on the Court.
None.
I confirm that i will take up permament residence in Strasbourg if elected.
Name, forename: SZKLANNA Agnieszka
Sex: Female
Date and place of birth: 25 December 1973, Gdańsk, Poland
Nationality/ies: Polish, French
2003-2004 – lawyer at the Polish division, Registry of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), Council of Europe, Strasbourg, France. Drafting decisions for committees of three judges and chamber judgments and dealing with applicants' mail.
2000-2001 – in the framework of the traineeship at the Warsaw Bar Association, trainee at six different courts in Warsaw (first and second-instance criminal and civil courts, regional commercial court and the land register division of the regional court).
Since 15 August 2009 until now – Secretary to the Committee on Legal Affairs and Human Rights, Secretariat of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe, Strasbourg, France. Main activities:
2020 – visiting professor, Law Faculty, Paris-Dauphine University, Paris. Teaching (comparative law) to M1 students.
2014-2015 and 2012-2013 – visiting professor, Political Sciences Institute, Strasbourg University. Teaching (human rights and relations between the Council of Europe and the European Union) to M1 and M2 students.
2004-2009 – administrator – legal officer, Department for the Execution of Judgments of the European Court of Human Rights, General Directorate of Human Rights and Legal Affairs, Council of Europe. Main activities: analysing judgments of the ECtHR in order to determine individual and general measures to be taken by respondent States; preparing cases for their examination by the Committee of Ministers (drafting draft notes, decisions, interim or final resolutions); taking part in negotiations with respondent States’ delegations; supervising other lawyers; giving conferences on the activities of the Department to study visitors (lawyers, judges and prosecutors, law students and PhD students), staff members of the ECtHR Registry and at external events in member States of the Council of Europe.
1999-2004 – trainee barrister, Karniol Małecki i Wspólnicy Sp. z o.o. law firm, Warsaw. Main activities: drafting legal opinions, draft agreements, judicial correspondence and other documents in cases concerning mainly civil, commercial and criminal law, pleading on behalf of clients before courts; translating legal documents into/from French and English.
1999-2004 – PhD student, academic assistant, International Law Institute, Faculty of Law and Administration, Warsaw University. Giving tutorials on public international law.
2000 – consultancy assignments for the ministry of Health, Warsaw. Drafting legal opinions on the compatibility of Polish legislation with the European Union law on public health and consumers’ protection.
2000 – trainee, DG Health and Consumer Protection, European Commission, Brussels.
1999 – lawyer, law firm Gide Loyrette Nouël Polska Sp. z o.o., Warsaw. Main activities: drafting legal opinions on issues of administrative and civil law, translating legal documents into/from French and English.
1998-2003 – translation of legal texts (including European Union directives, Polish laws and articles on legal issues) for private entities, the Warsaw University and the Ministry of Telecommunications.
See items III a) et b) above.
2016 and 2017 – member of the jury of the Moot Court competition organised by the European Law Students’ Association (ELSA), Council of Europe.
Outside the scope of my professional activities, speaking at seminars and conferences, namely:
See item III above.
None.
None.
Law, European integration.
Respectively since 2004, 2007 and 2001.
Member of the Warsaw Bar Association (as a non-practicing barrister), of the European Society of International Law (ESIL) and of the College of Europe Alumni Association.
A monograph on: Legal protection of aliens under the case law of the European Court of Human Rights (in Polish), Europrawo, Warsaw, 2010.
Twenty articles, including:
|
Language |
Reading |
Writing |
Speaking |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
very good |
good |
fair |
very good |
good |
fair |
very good |
good |
fair |
|
|
a. First language: |
|||||||||
|
Polish |
X |
X |
X |
||||||
|
b. Official languages: |
|||||||||
|
– English |
X |
X |
X |
||||||
|
– French |
X |
X |
X |
||||||
|
c. Other languages: |
|||||||||
|
– Spanish |
X |
X |
X |
||||||
|
– German |
X |
X |
X |
||||||
|
– Russian |
X |
X |
X |
||||||
None.
I currently live in Strasbourg and will continue to live there if elected a judge on the Court.