Addressing risks to human rights and the rule of law posed by mercenaries and private military and security companies: a call for comprehensive regulation
Reply to Recommendation
| Doc. 16303
| 11 December 2025
- Origin
- Adopted at the 1546th meeting
of the Ministers’ Deputies (10 December 2025). 2026 - First part-session
- Reply to Recommendation
- : Recommendation 2289
(2025)
1. The Committee of Ministers has carefully
examined Parliamentary Assembly
Recommendation 2289 (2025) “Addressing
risks to human rights and the rule of law posed by mercenaries and
private military and security companies: a call for comprehensive
regulation” and has forwarded it to the European Committee on Crime
Problems (CDPC), the Committee of Legal Advisers on Public International
Law (CAHDI) and the European Commission for Democracy through Law
(Venice Commission) for information and possible comments.
2. The Committee of Ministers recalls that the Venice Commission
has addressed the issues raised by the Assembly in its 2009 report
on private military and security firms and erosion of the State
monopoly on the use of force (see document CDL‑AD(2009)038) and
in its 2016 Rule of Law Checklist (see CDL-AD(2016)007), which is
currently being updated. Both these documents point to the scarcity
of international regulation in governing the operation of private
military and security companies (PMSCs) which poses grave risks
to democracy, the rule of law and the protection of human rights.
3. In light of these concerns, the Committee of Ministers agrees
with the Assembly that the development of a regional legal framework
could complement the ongoing work of the United Nations in its open-ended intergovernmental
working group to elaborate the content of an international regulatory
framework on the regulation, monitoring and oversight of the activities
of private military and security companies. The Committee underlines,
however, that the legal nature of the draft framework under discussion
at the UN remains to be determined, and stresses the importance
of avoiding duplication between UN efforts and any future Council
of Europe initiatives. It therefore invites the CDPC, in the context
of the next budgetary cycle (2028-2029), to consider the need for
and feasibility of drawing up a non-binding and/or binding Council
of Europe instrument focused on mitigating the risks to human rights,
democracy and the rule of law posed by PMSCs, taking account in
particular of the relevant work of the Venice Commission (paragraphs
3 and 5.2 of the Assembly’s recommendation).
4. Furthermore, in order to co-ordinate this work, the Committee
of Ministers invites the Secretary General to consider the Assembly’s
call for the Council of Europe to contribute to the above-mentioned
UN open-ended intergovernmental working group, and take action as
appropriate, ensuring that any contribution by the Council of Europe
would be complementary to the ongoing UN process (paragraph 5.3
of the Assembly’s recommendation).
5. Finally, in view of the gravity of the matter, the Committee
of Ministers agrees with the Assembly that the Council of Europe
should join the 61 States, including 39 Council of Europe member
States, and the EU, OSCE and NATO in endorsing the Montreux Document
on pertinent international legal obligations and good practices for
States related to operations of private military and security companies
during armed conflict.