Logo Assembly Logo Hemicycle

The functioning of democratic institutions in Poland

Doc. 15025: collection of written amendments | Doc. 15025 | 27/01/2020 | Final version

Caption: AdoptedRejectedWithdrawnNo electronic votes

ADraft Resolution

1The Assembly reiterates that democracy, the rule of law and respect for human rights are interlinked and cannot exist without one another. Respecting, but also fostering and strengthening, these three fundamental principles is an obligation incumbent upon all member states. Conversely, any developments in a member state that undermine or weaken one of these fundamental principles is of immediate concern.
2Member states therefore not only have the right, but indeed have the obligation to address shortcomings in its justice system and to take any measure that strengthens the independence of the judiciary and the efficient administration of justice. The Assembly recognises the challenges faced by the Polish justice system and judiciary, especially with regard to the efficiency of the administration of justice – as noted by the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights in its judgments against Poland. It therefore welcomes the stated priority given by the Polish authorities to address the shortcomings in the Polish justice system. At the same time, the Assembly emphasises that it is essential that the reforms implemented are fully in line with European norms and standards and effectively strengthen judicial independence and the rule of law, and not weaken or undermine them.

27 January 2020

Tabled by Mr Dominik TARCZYŃSKI, Mr Włodzimierz BERNACKI, Ms Iwona ARENT, Mr Arkadiusz MULARCZYK, Mr Marek AST, Mr Daniel MILEWSKI

Votes: 34 in favor 96 against 11 abstentions

In the draft resolution, paragraph 2, at the end of the first sentence, insert the following words: "according to its social, cultural and political conditions".

27 January 2020

Tabled by Mr Dominik TARCZYŃSKI, Mr Włodzimierz BERNACKI, Ms Iwona ARENT, Mr Arkadiusz MULARCZYK, Mr Marek AST, Mr Daniel MILEWSKI

Votes: 30 in favor 111 against 5 abstentions

In the draft resolution, paragraph 2, delete the following sentence: "At the same time, the Assembly emphasises that it is essential that the reforms implemented are fully in line with European norms and standards and effectively strengthen judicial independance and the rule of law, and not weaken or undermine them."

3In addition, recognising the inherent vulnerability to corporatism and protection of self-interest of any professional self-governance mechanism, it welcomes any reform of the judicial self-governance structures that aim to increase their transparency and accountability, while preserving their independence and autonomy. However, it considers it unacceptable if such reforms would amount to bringing the judiciary under the control of the executive or legislature, or even worse, under the political control of the ruling majority. This would violate the principle of separation of powers and effectively end the independence of the judiciary and undermine the rule of law.

27 January 2020

Tabled by Mr Dominik TARCZYŃSKI, Mr Włodzimierz BERNACKI, Ms Iwona ARENT, Mr Arkadiusz MULARCZYK, Mr Marek AST, Mr Daniel MILEWSKI

Votes: 29 in favor 116 against 3 abstentions

In the draft resolution, paragraph 3, after the words: "it welcomes any reform of the judicial", delete the following word: "self-governance".

27 January 2020

Tabled by Mr Dominik TARCZYŃSKI, Mr Włodzimierz BERNACKI, Ms Iwona ARENT, Mr Arkadiusz MULARCZYK, Mr Marek AST, Mr Daniel MILEWSKI

Votes: 141 in favor 4 against 10 abstentions

In the draft resolution, paragraph 3, first sentence, replace the words "transparency and accountability" with the following words: "transparency, accountability and democratisation".

27 January 2020

Tabled by Mr Dominik TARCZYŃSKI, Mr Włodzimierz BERNACKI, Ms Iwona ARENT, Mr Arkadiusz MULARCZYK, Mr Marek AST, Mr Daniel MILEWSKI

Votes: 34 in favor 114 against 6 abstentions

In the draft resolution, paragraph 3, second sentence, delete the word: "However".

27 January 2020

Tabled by Mr Dominik TARCZYŃSKI, Mr Daniel MILEWSKI, Mr Włodzimierz BERNACKI, Ms Iwona ARENT, Mr Arkadiusz MULARCZYK, Mr Marek AST

Votes: 34 in favor 114 against 10 abstentions

In the draft resolution, paragraph 3, after the words: "such reforms would amount to bringing the judiciary", insert the following words: "activity of the courts".

27 January 2020

Tabled by Mr Dominik TARCZYŃSKI, Mr Daniel MILEWSKI, Mr Włodzimierz BERNACKI, Ms Iwona ARENT, Mr Arkadiusz MULARCZYK, Mr Marek AST

Votes: 28 in favor 120 against 11 abstentions

In the draft resolution, paragraph 3, delete the following words: ",or even worse, under the political control of the ruling majority. This would violate the principle of separation of powers and effectively end the independence of the judiciary and undermine the rule of law".

27 January 2020

Tabled by Mr Dominik TARCZYŃSKI, Mr Daniel MILEWSKI, Mr Włodzimierz BERNACKI, Ms Iwona ARENT, Mr Arkadiusz MULARCZYK, Mr Marek AST

Votes: 33 in favor 120 against 9 abstentions

In the draft resolution, at the end of paragraph 3, insert the following sentence: "Each reform of the judiciary should respect the principle of separation of powers, but also should provide the democratic legitimacy necessary in a democratic society."

4The Assembly deeply regrets that the reforms of the judiciary and justice system in Poland do not pass the two above-mentioned litmus tests. It expresses its serious concern about the fact that these reforms in numerous aspects run counter to European norms and standards. They cumulatively undermine and severely damage the independence of the judiciary and the rule of law in Poland. Moreover, the reforms have made the judicial system vulnerable to political interference and attempts to bring it under political control of the executive, which challenges the very principles of a democratic state governed by the rule of law.

27 January 2020

Tabled by Mr Dominik TARCZYŃSKI, Mr Daniel MILEWSKI, Ms Iwona ARENT, Mr Arkadiusz MULARCZYK, Mr Marek AST, Mr Włodzimierz BERNACKI

Votes: 33 in favor 125 against 9 abstentions

In the draft resolution, delete paragraph 4.

5The centralisation of excessive and discretionary powers over the judiciary and prosecution service in the hands of the Minister of Justice and, to a lesser extent, the President of the Republic, render the justice system vulnerable to political interference and abuse and is of concern. This should be promptly addressed by the authorities.

27 January 2020

Tabled by Mr Dominik TARCZYŃSKI, Mr Włodzimierz BERNACKI, Ms Iwona ARENT, Mr Arkadiusz MULARCZYK, Mr Marek AST, Mr Daniel MILEWSKI

Votes: 33 in favor 128 against 7 abstentions

In the draft resolution, delete paragraph 5.

6The constitutional crisis that ensued over the composition of the Constitutional Court remains of concern and should be resolved. No democratic government that respects the rule of law can selectively ignore court decisions it does not like, especially those of the Constitutional Court. The full and unconditional implementation of all Constitutional Court decisions by the authorities, including with regard to the composition of the Constitutional Court itself, should be the cornerstone of the resolution of the crisis. The restoration of the legality of the composition of the Court in line with European standards is essential and should be a priority. The Assembly is especially concerned about the potential impact of the Constitutional Court’s apparent illegal composition on Poland’s obligations under the European Convention of Human Rights.
7The Assembly lauds the assistance given by the Council of Europe to ensure that that the reform of the justice system in Poland is developed and implemented in line with European norms and rule of law principles in order to meet their stated objectives. However, it notes that numerous recommendations of the Venice Commission and other bodies of the Council of Europe have not been implemented or addressed by the authorities. The Assembly is convinced that many of the shortcomings in the current judicial system, especially with regard to the independence of the judiciary, could have been addressed or prevented by these recommendations. The Assembly therefore calls upon the authorities to revisit the total reform package for the judiciary and amend the relevant legislation and practice in line with Council of Europe recommendations. In particular with regard to:

27 January 2020

Tabled by Mr Dominik TARCZYŃSKI, Mr Włodzimierz BERNACKI, Ms Iwona ARENT, Mr Arkadiusz MULARCZYK, Mr Marek AST, Mr Daniel MILEWSKI

Votes: 33 in favor 131 against 7 abstentions

In the draft resolution, paragraph 7, at the end of the first sentence, insert the following words: "and welcomes Poland's openness to dialogue on justice reforms."

27 January 2020

Tabled by Mr Dominik TARCZYŃSKI, Mr Włodzimierz BERNACKI, Ms Iwona ARENT, Mr Arkadiusz MULARCZYK, Mr Marek AST, Mr Daniel MILEWSKI

Votes: 30 in favor 133 against 9 abstentions

In the draft resolution, paragraph 7, delete the following sentences: "However, it notes that numerous recommendations of the Venice Commission and other bodies of the Council of Europe have not been implemented or addressed by the authorities. The Assembly is convinced that many of the shortcomings in the current judicial system, especially with regard to the independence of the judiciary, could have been addressed or prevented by these recommendations."

27 January 2020

Tabled by Mr Dominik TARCZYŃSKI, Mr Daniel MILEWSKI, Mr Włodzimierz BERNACKI, Ms Iwona ARENT, Mr Arkadiusz MULARCZYK, Mr Marek AST

Votes: 31 in favor 132 against 7 abstentions

In the draft resolution, paragraph 7, replace the words "calls upon" with the following word "asks".

27 January 2020

Tabled by Mr Dominik TARCZYŃSKI, Mr Włodzimierz BERNACKI, Ms Iwona ARENT, Mr Arkadiusz MULARCZYK, Mr Marek AST, Mr Daniel MILEWSKI

Votes: 30 in favor 135 against 6 abstentions

In the draft resolution, paragraph 7, replace the words "revisit" with the following word: "consider".

7.1the reform of the Public Prosecutors Office, the Assembly considers that the ad personam merger of the posts of Minister of Justice and Prosecutor General, and the extensive discretionary powers over the prosecution service and the actual prosecution of individual cases itself given to the Minster of Justice, undermine the impartiality and independence of the Prosecution Service and make it vulnerable to politicisation and abuse. The Assembly considers that these two functions need to be separated urgently and that sufficient safeguards against abuse and politicisation of the prosecution service need to be introduced in the law. It calls upon the Polish authorities to do so as a matter of priority;

27 January 2020

Tabled by Mr Dominik TARCZYŃSKI, Mr Daniel MILEWSKI, Mr Włodzimierz BERNACKI, Ms Iwona ARENT, Mr Arkadiusz MULARCZYK, Mr Marek AST

Votes: 33 in favor 131 against 7 abstentions

In the draft resolution, paragraph 7.1, first sentence, replace the words: "considers that", with the following word: "notes".

27 January 2020

Tabled by Mr Dominik TARCZYŃSKI, Mr Daniel MILEWSKI, Mr Włodzimierz BERNACKI, Ms Iwona ARENT, Mr Arkadiusz MULARCZYK, Mr Marek AST

Votes: 30 in favor 134 against 7 abstentions

In the draft resolution, paragraph 7.1, delete the words "extensive discretionary".

27 January 2020

Tabled by Mr Dominik TARCZYŃSKI, Mr Włodzimierz BERNACKI, Ms Iwona ARENT, Mr Daniel MILEWSKI, Mr Arkadiusz MULARCZYK, Mr Marek AST

Votes: 28 in favor 135 against 8 abstentions

In the draft resolution, paragraph 7.1, delete the following words: "undermine the impartiality and independence of the Prosecution Service and make it vulnerable to politicisation and abuse. The Assembly considers that these two functions need to be separated urgently and that sufficient safeguards against abuse and politicisation of the prosecution service need to be introduced in the law. It calls upon the Polish authorities to do so as a matter of priority;"

7.2the reform of the National Council of the Judiciary, the Assembly expresses its concern about the fact that, counter to European rule of law standards, the 15 Judge members on the National Council of the Judiciary are no longer elected by their peers but by the Polish parliament. This runs counter to the principle of separation of powers and the independence of the judiciary. As a result, the National Council of the Judiciary can no longer be seen as an independent self-governing body of the judiciary. The Assembly therefore urges the authorities to reinstate the direct election, by their peers, of the judges members of the National Council of the Judiciary;

27 January 2020

Tabled by Mr Dominik TARCZYŃSKI, Mr Włodzimierz BERNACKI, Ms Iwona ARENT, Mr Daniel MILEWSKI, Mr Arkadiusz MULARCZYK, Mr Marek AST

Votes: 31 in favor 132 against 8 abstentions

In the draft resolution, paragraph 7.2, first sentence, replace the words "expresses its concern about the fact" with the following word: "notes".

27 January 2020

Tabled by Mr Dominik TARCZYŃSKI, Mr Daniel MILEWSKI, Mr Włodzimierz BERNACKI, Ms Iwona ARENT, Mr Arkadiusz MULARCZYK, Mr Marek AST

Votes: 28 in favor 131 against 7 abstentions

In the draft resolution, paragraph 7.2, delete the following words: "counter to European rule of law standards,"

27 January 2020

Tabled by Mr Dominik TARCZYŃSKI, Mr Daniel MILEWSKI, Mr Włodzimierz BERNACKI, Ms Iwona ARENT, Mr Arkadiusz MULARCZYK, Mr Marek AST

Votes: 25 in favor 130 against 11 abstentions

In the draft resolution, paragraph 7.2, replace the words "counter to the principle of separation of powers and the independence of the judiciary. As a result, the National Council of the Judiciary can no longer be seen as an independent self-governing body of the judiciary. The Assembly therefore urges the authorities to reinstate the direct election, by their peers, of the judges members of the National Council of the Judiciary;" with the following words: "according to the principle of the balance of powers;"

7.3the reform of the common courts, the Assembly is deeply concerned about the excessive and discretionary powers over the justice system and judiciary conferred to the Minister of justice, including with regard to the appointment and dismissal of court presidents, disciplinary proceedings against judges and the internal organisation of the courts. This is compounded by the equally excessive powers given to the Minister as Prosecutor General and the absence of a counterbalance by a genuinely independent National Council of the Judiciary. These powers need to be reduced and proper legal checks and balances need to be introduced in the relevant legislation;

27 January 2020

Tabled by Mr Dominik TARCZYŃSKI, Mr Włodzimierz BERNACKI, Ms Iwona ARENT, Mr Arkadiusz MULARCZYK, Mr Daniel MILEWSKI, Mr Marek AST

Votes: 31 in favor 131 against 7 abstentions

In the draft resolution, paragraph 7.3, first sentence, replace the words: "is deeply concerned about the excessive and discretionary powers over the justice system and judiciary conferred to the Minister of Justice" with the following words: "notes that the Minister of Justice has powers over the justice system and judiciary".

27 January 2020

Tabled by Mr Dominik TARCZYŃSKI, Mr Daniel MILEWSKI, Mr Włodzimierz BERNACKI, Ms Iwona ARENT, Mr Arkadiusz MULARCZYK, Mr Marek AST

Votes: 30 in favor 131 against 9 abstentions

In the draft resolution, paragraph 7.3, delete the following sentences: "This is compounded by the equally excessive powers given to the Minister as Prosecutor General and the absence of a counterbalance by a genuinely independent National Council of the Judiciary. These powers need to be reduced and proper legal checks and balances need to be introduced in the relevant legislation".

7.4the reform of the Supreme Court, the Assembly deplores the attempts to force a considerable number of Supreme Court Judges into early retirement, in violation of European standards. The Assembly therefore expresses its satisfaction that these judges were reinstalled following the judgment by the Court of Justice of the European Union. The introduction of the possibility of a so-called extraordinary appeal, on wide ranging and subjective grounds, against judgments that are already finalised and whose appeals process has been terminated in accordance with the law, is of serious concern as it violates the principle of legal certainty and res judicata. The Assembly is concerned that the introduction of the extraordinary appeal could considerably increase the number of applications against Poland before the European Court of Human Rights. The composition, and manner of appointment, of the members of the disciplinary and extraordinary appeals chambers of the Supreme Court, which include lay-members, in combination with extensive powers of these two chambers, raise questions about their independence and their vulnerability to politicisation and abuse. This needs to be addressed.

In the draft resolution, paragraph 7.4, replace the words: ", raise questions about their independence and their vulnerability to politicisation and abuse. This needs to be addressed." with the following words: "and the fact that their members were elected by the new National Council of the Judiciary, raise questions about their independance and their vulnerability to politicisation and abuse. This needs to be addressed urgently."

8The Assembly takes note of the recent ruling by the Polish Supreme Court that the National Council of the Judiciary cannot be considered an impartial and independent body, and that the new disciplinary chamber of the Supreme Court cannot be considered a court within the meaning of European and Polish law. It calls upon the Polish authorities to fully abide by this judgment and to address without further delay these two fundamental shortcomings in the Polish legal system.

27 January 2020

Tabled by Mr Dominik TARCZYŃSKI, Mr Włodzimierz BERNACKI, Ms Iwona ARENT, Mr Arkadiusz MULARCZYK, Mr Daniel MILEWSKI, Mr Marek AST

If adopted, amendments 23, 40 falls.

Votes: 31 in favor 135 against 6 abstentions

In the draft resolution, delete paragraph 8.

27 January 2020

Tabled by Mr Piero FASSINO, Mr Christian PETRY, Mr Martin POLIAČIK, Mr Roberto RAMPI, Mr Gianni MARILOTTI, Mr Krzysztof ŚMISZEK

If adopted, amendment 23 falls. Falls if amendment 24 is adopted.

Votes: 114 in favor 42 against 14 abstentions

In the draft resolution, replace paragraph 8 with the following paragraph:

"The Assembly takes note of the recent ruling by the Polish Supreme Court of 5 December 2019, issued on the basis of the guidelines contained in the judgement of the CJEU of 19 November 2019, that the National Council of the Judiciary cannot be considered an impartial and independent body, and that the new disciplinary chamber of the Supreme Court cannot be considered a court within the meaning of European and Polish law. The Assembly also takes note of the Supreme Court's resolution of 23 January 2020, stating that any judges appointed by the National Council of the Judiciary are not authorised to adjudicate. The Assembly is deeply concerned by the Polish Government's reaction to the resolution, which considers it to be unlawful. It calls upon the Polish authorities to fully abide by the judgment and resolution and to address without further delay these fundamental shortcomings in the Polish legal system."

27 January 2020

Tabled by Mr Dominik TARCZYŃSKI, Mr Włodzimierz BERNACKI, Ms Iwona ARENT, Mr Daniel MILEWSKI, Mr Arkadiusz MULARCZYK, Mr Marek AST

Falls if amendments 24, 40 are adopted.

In the draft resolution, at the end of paragraph 8, insert the following sentences: "However, this judgement is non-binding, according to Polish rules, in contrary to the judgement of Supreme Court - Chamber of Extraordinary Control and Public Affairs, stating that: - the act of judge’s nomination cannot be put in question; - the EUCJ judgement of November 19th 2019 does not qualify National Judiciary Council as not independent because of its composition (members elected by the Parliament). So, the independency of National Judiciary Council can be put in question only with relations to particular circumstances existing in the particular proceedings. This last judgement has been given after EUCJ judgement of 19th November 2019 – and, according, to the Supreme Court – is in line with the aforementioned judgement. It’s binding for all panels of Supreme Court - Chamber of Extraordinary Control and Public Affairs."

In the draft resolution, after paragraph 8, insert the following paragraph:

"The Assembly expresses its deep concern about the draft amendments to the Law on the Common Courts, the Law on the Supreme Court and some other laws of the Republic of Poland, as adopted by the Sejm on 23 January 2020, despite their rejection by the Polish Senate on 17 January 2020 and the very critical assessment by the Venice Commission of these amendments. It regrets that these amendments were considered under an accelerated procedure without any consultation with the main stakeholders or civil society. The Assembly welcomes and supports the urgent opinion of the Venice Commission on these amendments. The Assembly considers that adoption of these amendments further deteriorates the independence of the judiciary and respect for the rule of law in Poland and runs counter to the country’s obligations under international law, including its obligations deriving from membership to the Council of Europe. In addition, they are at odds with articles 6 and 10 of the ECHR. The Assembly therefore urges President Duda not to sign these amendments into Law and calls upon the authorities to fully respect the judgment of the Polish Supreme Court of 23 January 2020, as well as of the international tribunals they are party to, including those of the CJEU. The Assembly further calls upon the Polish authorities to promptly address the shortcomings and deficiencies of the justice system highlighted in, inter alia, this resolution."

9The often-heard argument that the Polish justice reforms are in line with European standards, solely because certain aspects of the reforms allegedly also exist in other countries, is invalid and should be disregarded. Even if certain provisions are similar to those in other countries, they cannot be taken out of the context of the overall legal framework and legal tradition in which they exist. Accepting such arguments would amount to the possible “Frankensteinisation of legislation”, which would be based on a combination of “worst practices” existing in other countries, instead of on best practice and common European standards.

27 January 2020

Tabled by Mr Dominik TARCZYŃSKI, Mr Włodzimierz BERNACKI, Ms Iwona ARENT, Mr Daniel MILEWSKI, Mr Arkadiusz MULARCZYK, Mr Marek AST

Votes: 31 in favor 125 against 10 abstentions

In the draft resolution, paragraph 9, replace the words "The often-heard argument that" with the following word: "Although".

27 January 2020

Tabled by Mr Dominik TARCZYŃSKI, Mr Daniel MILEWSKI, Mr Włodzimierz BERNACKI, Ms Iwona ARENT, Mr Arkadiusz MULARCZYK, Mr Marek AST

Votes: 29 in favor 130 against 8 abstentions

In the draft resolution, paragraph 9, delete the following words: "are in line with European standards, solely because certain aspects of the reforms allegedly also exist in other countries, is invalid and should be disregarded. Even if certain provisions".

27 January 2020

Tabled by Mr Dominik TARCZYŃSKI, Mr Włodzimierz BERNACKI, Ms Iwona ARENT, Mr Arkadiusz MULARCZYK, Mr Daniel MILEWSKI, Mr Marek AST

Votes: 29 in favor 131 against 8 abstentions

In the draft resolution, paragraph 9, second sentence, replace the word "those" with the following words: "models existing".

27 January 2020

Tabled by Mr Dominik TARCZYŃSKI, Mr Włodzimierz BERNACKI, Ms Iwona ARENT, Mr Arkadiusz MULARCZYK, Mr Daniel MILEWSKI, Mr Marek AST

Votes: 37 in favor 123 against 11 abstentions

In the draft resolution, paragraph 9, replace the words “Accepting such arguments would amount to the possible 'Frankensteinisation of legislation', which would be based on a combination of 'worst practices' existing in other countries, instead of on best practice and common European standards” with the following words: “Seeking best practice from other countries should always take that aspect into account”

10The Assembly deplores the abuse of disciplinary proceedings against judges and prosecutors in Poland. It reiterates is concern that the political control of the Minister of Justice over the initiation and conduct of these proceedings does not provide the required safeguard against their abuse. The very high number of investigations started against judges and prosecutors, on subjective grounds, which subsequently are neither formally ended nor result in the start of formal proceedings, deprive the judges and prosecutors concerned of their right of defence and has a chilling effect on the judiciary. This therefore undermines its independence. The credible reports that disciplinary investigations have been started against judges and prosecutors solely for being critical about the justice reforms, and the fact that disciplinary investigations have been started against judges as a result of decisions they have taken when adjudicating cases in their courts, needs to be condemned. In this context, the credible reports that a politically motivated smear campaign was organised against members of the judiciary by, and with the involvement of, high ranking officials in the Ministry of Justice and National Council of the Judiciary, is both deplorable and concerning: it undermines both the independence of, and the public trust in, the judiciary. The organisation of these smear campaigns needs to be fully investigated and those responsible identified. It is clear that an investigation by the prosecution service under direct control of the Minster of Justice, which is also a potential party to the investigation, would lack the required independence and credibility. The Assembly therefore calls upon the Polish authorities to establish, at the earliest opportunity, but no later than 31 March 2019, an independent public inquiry into these smear campaigns and those responsible for them.

27 January 2020

Tabled by Mr Dominik TARCZYŃSKI, Mr Daniel MILEWSKI, Mr Włodzimierz BERNACKI, Ms Iwona ARENT, Mr Arkadiusz MULARCZYK, Mr Marek AST

If adopted, amendments 43, 45 falls.

Votes: 32 in favor 131 against 7 abstentions

In the draft resolution, delete paragraph 10.

27 January 2020

Tabled by Mr Maurizio BUCCARELLA, Mr Michael LINK, Mr Gerardo GIOVAGNOLI, Mr Andreas NICK, Ms Doris BARNETT, Mr Christian PETRY, Mr Axel SCHÄFER

Falls if amendment 29 is adopted.

Votes: 21 in favor 134 against 16 abstentions

In the draft resolution, paragraph 10, replace the words: "The credible reports that disciplinary investigations have been started against judges and prosecutors solely for being critical about the justice reforms, and the fact that disciplinary investigations have been started against judges as a result of decisions they have taken when adjudicating cases in their courts, needs to be condemned. In this context, the credible reports that a politically motivated smear campaign was organised against members of the judiciary by, and with the involvement of, high ranking officials in the Ministry of Justice and National Council of the Judiciary, is both deplorable and concerning: it undermines both the independence of, and the public trust in, the judiciary." with the following words: "The fact, suggested by credible reports, that disciplinary investigations have been started against judges and prosecutors solely for being critical about the justice reforms, and the fact that disciplinary investigations have been started against judges as a result of decisions they have taken when adjudicating cases in their courts - especially when implementing the guidelines of 19 November 2019 CJEU ruling or requesting an ECJ preliminary ruling - needs to be condemned. In this context, the politically motivated smear campaign, organised against members of the judiciary by, and with the involvement of, high ranking officials in the Ministry of Justice and National Council of the Judiciary, as confirmed by credible reports, is both deplorable and concerning: it undermines both the independence of, and the public trust in, the judiciary."

27 January 2020

Tabled by Mr Maurizio BUCCARELLA, Mr Michael LINK, Mr Gerardo GIOVAGNOLI, Ms Doris BARNETT, Mr Christian PETRY, Mr Axel SCHÄFER

Falls if amendment 29 is adopted.

Votes: 136 in favor 27 against 5 abstentions

In the draft resolution, paragraph 10, last sentence, replace "31 March 2019" with "31 March 2020".

27 January 2020

Tabled by Mr Maurizio BUCCARELLA, Mr Gerardo GIOVAGNOLI, Mr Andreas NICK, Ms Doris BARNETT, Mr Christian PETRY

Votes: 27 in favor 136 against 9 abstentions

In the draft resolution, after paragraph 10, insert the following paragraph:

"The Assembly is concerned by the Amendments to the Law on Common Courts, the Law on the Supreme Court and some other laws, or so-called "disciplinary law" passed through the Sejm on 23 January 2020, which seem to strengthen the political control over judges. These changes are unacceptable and further undermine the independence of the judiciary, as noted in Opinion No. 977/2019 of the Venice Commission."

11The Assembly notes that the concerns about the independence of the Polish judiciary and justice system, as well as Poland’s adherence to the rule of law, directly affect Europe as a whole. The questions about the independence of the justice system and the respect for the rule of law are therefore not to be considered as internal issues for Poland. The Assembly calls upon all Council of Europe member states to ensure that the courts under their jurisdiction ascertain in all relevant criminal cases – including with regard to European Arrest Warrants – as well as in relevant civil cases, whether fair legal proceedings in Poland, as meant by Article 6 of the European Convention for Human Rights, can be guaranteed for the defendants.

27 January 2020

Tabled by Mr Dominik TARCZYŃSKI, Mr Daniel MILEWSKI, Mr Włodzimierz BERNACKI, Ms Iwona ARENT, Mr Arkadiusz MULARCZYK, Mr Marek AST

Votes: 30 in favor 132 against 8 abstentions

In the draft resolution, paragraph 11, first sentence, delete the words: "as well as Poland’s adherence to the rule of law,".

27 January 2020

Tabled by Mr Dominik TARCZYŃSKI, Mr Włodzimierz BERNACKI, Ms Iwona ARENT, Mr Arkadiusz MULARCZYK, Mr Daniel MILEWSKI, Mr Marek AST

Votes: 31 in favor 134 against 6 abstentions

In the draft resolution, paragraph 11, delete the second sentence.

27 January 2020

Tabled by Mr Dominik TARCZYŃSKI, Mr Daniel MILEWSKI, Mr Włodzimierz BERNACKI, Ms Iwona ARENT, Mr Arkadiusz MULARCZYK, Mr Marek AST

Votes: 30 in favor 133 against 8 abstentions

In the draft resolution, paragraph 11, third sentence, replace the words "calls upon" with the word: "asks".

27 January 2020

Tabled by Mr Dominik TARCZYŃSKI, Mr Daniel MILEWSKI, Mr Włodzimierz BERNACKI, Ms Iwona ARENT, Mr Arkadiusz MULARCZYK, Mr Marek AST

Votes: 31 in favor 135 against 9 abstentions

In the draft resolution, paragraph 11, third sentence, replace the words: "the courts under their jurisdiction" with the following words: «the decisions of their Courts under their jurisdiction».

27 January 2020

Tabled by Mr Dominik TARCZYŃSKI, Mr Daniel MILEWSKI, Mr Włodzimierz BERNACKI, Mr Arkadiusz MULARCZYK, Ms Iwona ARENT, Mr Marek AST

Votes: 29 in favor 137 against 8 abstentions

In the draft resolution, paragraph 11, third sentence, delete the words: "– including with regard to European Arrest Warrants –".

27 January 2020

Tabled by Mr Dominik TARCZYŃSKI, Mr Włodzimierz BERNACKI, Ms Iwona ARENT, Mr Daniel MILEWSKI, Mr Arkadiusz MULARCZYK, Mr Marek AST

Votes: 28 in favor 135 against 8 abstentions

In the draft resolution, paragraph 11, third sentence, replace the words "whether fair legal proceedings in Poland, as meant by Article 6 of the European Convention for Human Rights, can be guaranteed for the defendants" with the following words: "whether the interests of justice are pursued".

12The Assembly notes that, for part of the Polish population, the negotiated democratic transition of Poland following the fall of the Berlin wall, while a model for many, has failed to give closure for the crimes and excesses committed during the Communist era, and is perceived as having allowed those who profited from the Communist regime to have escaped justice for crimes committed and to safeguard their interests. The Assembly recognises that this issue is both sensitive and emotionally charged but considers that, 30 years after the end of the Communist regime, the need for lustration cannot be considered as a valid argument or appropriate guideline for any reforms of the justice system in Poland.

27 January 2020

Tabled by Mr Dominik TARCZYŃSKI, Ms Iwona ARENT, Mr Arkadiusz MULARCZYK, Mr Marek AST, Mr Daniel MILEWSKI

If adopted, amendment 37 falls.

Votes: 140 in favor 25 against 10 abstentions

In the draft resolution, paragraph 12, first sentence, replace the word "following" with the following words: "which contributed to".

In the draft resolution, paragraph 12, first sentence, replace the word "following" with the word "preceding".

13The Assembly is concerned about the fact that the harsh and intolerant political discourse in the Polish political environment has created an increasingly permissive climate for and has fostered a perception of impunity for hate speech and intolerant behaviour against minorities and other vulnerable, groups. This is unacceptable and should be addressed by the authorities.
14With regard to the media environment, the Assembly regrets that the media reforms did not address the problem of the politicised and biased nature of the media environment and public broadcaster. Instead, the media reforms aimed mostly at transferring control over the public broadcaster from the previous authorities to the current ruling majority. The Assembly calls upon the authorities to ensure a genuinely impartial and professional public broadcasting system is established in Poland.
15The Assembly welcomes the important role played by the broad and vibrant civil society in Poland. It therefore regrets that the polarisation in the political environment is affecting the space for civil society to operate, with consultations and co-operation between civil society and authorities increasingly being selective and based on ideological proximity.
16The legal reforms and their detrimental effects on the rule of law Poland have an overall negative effect on the effective functioning of democratic institutions in Poland. Regrettably, there are no indications that this issue will soon be resolved. The Assembly therefore resolves to continue to closely follow the developments with regard to the functioning of democratic institutions and the rule of law in Poland. The Assembly therefore invites its Monitoring Committee to consider expediting the periodic review report on Poland in the framework of monitoring of membership obligations of all member states of the Council of Europe.

27 January 2020

Tabled by Mr Stefan SCHENNACH, Ms Zita GURMAI, Mr George PAPANDREOU, Ms Sibel ARSLAN, Mr Krzysztof ŚMISZEK

If adopted, amendments 38, 41 falls.

Votes: 123 in favor 42 against 13 abstentions

In the draft resolution, paragraph 16, replace the words: "The Assembly therefore resolves to continue to closely follow the developments with regard to the functioning of democratic institutions and the rule of law in Poland. The Assembly therefore invites its Monitoring Committee to consider expediting the periodic review report on Poland in the framework of monitoring of membership obligations of all member states of the Council of Europe." with the following words: "The Assembly therefore decides to open the monitoring procedure in the respect of Poland until the above-mentioned concerns are addressed in a satisfactory manner."

Explanatory note

Given the scope of changes in the Polish legal system threatening the rule of law and legal certainty it is important to maintain Council of Europe regular monitoring on Poland.

27 January 2020

Tabled by Mr Piero FASSINO, Mr Michael LINK, Mr Maurizio BUCCARELLA, Mr Gerardo GIOVAGNOLI, Ms Doris BARNETT, Mr Christian PETRY, Mr Axel SCHÄFER

If adopted, amendment 38 falls. Falls if amendment 39 is adopted.

In the draft resolution, paragraph 16, replace the words: "The Assembly therefore invites its Monitoring Committee to consider expediting the periodic review report on Poland in the framework of monitoring of membership obligations of all member states of the Council of Europe." with the following words: "The Assembly therefore decides to open the monitoring procedure in the light of the fact that Poland has insufficient checks and balances."

In the draft resolution, replace the last sentence of paragraph 16 with the following sentences: "Also concerned by the compliance of these reforms with the Convention on Human Rights, in particular article 6 and article 10, the Assembly resolves to assess the situation during the June 2020 part session. The Assembly will assess progress on the recommendations made by the Venice Commission and by this Assembly as contained in this resolution. The Assembly resolves to return to this issue during the June 2020 part session to assess the progress made with implementing the recommendations made by the Assembly in this resolution and in particular with regard to: - the reform of the prosecutor's office such that it becomes independent of political interference; - the reform of the National Council of the Judiciary, making sure that it is a genuinely independent institution and its members are appointed in line with European standards; - the reform of the Common Courts and the Supreme Court; - the implementation of all judgements by the European Court of Justice; - the withdrawal or reversal of the controversial amendments on the Law on the Common Courts, the Law on the Supreme Court, as well as other laws adopted by the Sejm on 23 January 2020. In the unfortunate event that no or little tangible progress has been made on implementing the Assembly's recommendations by June 2020, the Assembly reserves the right to consider opening a full monitoring procedure with regard to Poland at that time."