Caption: AdoptedRejectedWithdrawnNo electronic votes
23 June 2014
Tabled by Ms Luise AMTSBERG, Ms Tineke STRIK, Ms Marit MAIJ, Mr Michael MCNAMARA, Mr Klaas de VRIES, Mr Boriss CILEVIČS
Votes: 53 in favor 76 against 14 abstentions
In the draft resolution, paragraph 4, replace the words "subsequent control of movement of the identified people, and swift and transparent processing of mixed migration flows" with the following words: "a fair and efficient asylum procedure".
23 June 2014
Tabled by Ms Luise AMTSBERG, Mr Boriss CILEVIČS, Ms Tineke STRIK, Ms Marit MAIJ, Mr Klaas de VRIES
Votes: 54 in favor 82 against 8 abstentions
In the draft resolution, paragraph 6, replace the words "people who enter the country irregularly do not continue their journey into other member States of the Council of Europe" with the following words: "refugees and asylum seekers have access to fair and efficient asylum procedures and adequate reception facilities in compliance with European Union standards".
23 June 2014
Tabled by Ms Tineke STRIK, Ms Luise AMTSBERG, Ms Marit MAIJ, Mr Michael MCNAMARA, Mr Klaas de VRIES, Mr Boriss CILEVIČS
Votes: 49 in favor 89 against 10 abstentions
In the draft resolution, replace paragraph 7.1.4 with the following paragraph:
"ensure that the Dublin Regulation is applied in a way that allows refugees to access durable solutions and avoids irregular onward movements;"
Explanatory note
The previous wording contradicts paragraph 4.5 of the draft recommendation. The amended wording clarifies that the responsibility of the country of first arrival is to determine which State has responsibility for an asylum claim on the basis of criteria which include family links. This minimises the need for irregular onward movement and provides durable solutions to refugees.
23 June 2014
Tabled by Ms Luise AMTSBERG, Mr Boriss CILEVIČS, Ms Tineke STRIK, Mr Andrej HUNKO, Mr Tiny KOX
Votes: 55 in favor 92 against 8 abstentions
In the draft resolution, delete paragraph 9.2.
Explanatory note
Identifying migrants and asylum seekers through the use of DNA records in addition to fingerprints would be disproportionate and discriminatory. DNA records are particularly sensitive data which may only be used to identify individuals for the prevention, detection and investigation of criminal offences.
23 June 2014
Tabled by Ms Tineke STRIK, Ms Luise AMTSBERG, Ms Marit MAIJ, Mr Michael MCNAMARA, Mr Klaas de VRIES, Mr Boriss CILEVIČS
Votes: 52 in favor 93 against 6 abstentions
In the draft resolution, paragraph 9.3, after the word "effective", insert the following words: "and include effective human rights safeguards".
Explanatory note
Border control measures must be accompanied by effective human rights safeguards. Without such safeguards, border control measures risk violating human rights, denying access to protection and leading to refoulement.
23 June 2014
Tabled by Ms Luise AMTSBERG, Ms Tineke STRIK, Ms Marit MAIJ, Mr Michael MCNAMARA, Mr Klaas de VRIES, Mr Boriss CILEVIČS
Votes: 52 in favor 90 against 13 abstentions
In the draft resolution, replace paragraph 9.4 with the following paragraph:
"respond positively to suggestions for the exploration of further possibilities for protected entry into Europe and to open legal channels for migrants to reach the territory in a regular manner;".
23 June 2014
Tabled by Mr Vincenzo SANTANGELO, Ms Maria Edera SPADONI, Ms Cristina DE PIETRO, Mr Manlio DI STEFANO, Ms Nunzia CATALFO
Votes: 61 in favor 80 against 18 abstentions
In the draft resolution, paragraph 9.4, replace the word "camps" with the word "centres".
23 June 2014
Tabled by Mr Vincenzo SANTANGELO, Ms Maria Edera SPADONI, Ms Cristina DE PIETRO, Mr Manlio DI STEFANO, Ms Nunzia CATALFO
Votes: 63 in favor 89 against 13 abstentions
In the draft resolution, paragraph 9.6, replace the words "Libyan coastguard" with the following words: "North African countries".
23 June 2014
Tabled by Ms Tineke STRIK, Ms Luise AMTSBERG, Ms Marit MAIJ, Mr Michael MCNAMARA, Mr Klaas de VRIES, Mr Boriss CILEVIČS
Votes: 56 in favor 92 against 13 abstentions
In the draft recommendation, delete paragraph 4.2.
Explanatory note
International agreements allowing European countries to intercept in the territorial waters of a non-EU country cannot circumvent international human rights obligations which bind authorities exercising de facto and/or de jure jurisdiction over the people intercepted. Any automatic arrangement for returning people to a non-EU country would be in violation of the obligation to assess the personal circumstances of individuals set out in the Hirsi judgement.
23 June 2014
Tabled by Ms Luise AMTSBERG, Mr Boriss CILEVIČS, Ms Tineke STRIK, Mr Andrej HUNKO, Mr Tiny KOX
Votes: 49 in favor 110 against 10 abstentions
In the draft recommendation, delete paragraph 4.3.
Explanatory note
States are under an obligation to ensure that people intercepted have access to individualised procedures and there is no refoulement, including in the context of bilateral readmission or migration control agreements. This recommendation encourages EU countries to make return arrangements with countries such as Egypt and Libya where patterns of human rights abuses against migrants and refugees have been documented.
23 June 2014
Tabled by Ms Luise AMTSBERG, Mr Boriss CILEVIČS, Ms Tineke STRIK, Mr Andrej HUNKO, Mr Tiny KOX
Votes: 49 in favor 111 against 7 abstentions
In the draft recommendation, replace paragraph 4.4 with the following paragraph:
"require, as its top priority for the comming year, that each member state of the Council of Europe, in accordance with the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the case of Hirsi Jamaa and Others v. Italy (23 February 2011, Application No. 27765/09), review their border control and return operations in order to ensure the full respect of the principle of non-refoulement with regard to every individual intercepted outside their territory and rule out the possibility of collective expulsions, as prohibited under Article 4 of Protocol IV to the ECHR, in line with the Court's judgment."
23 June 2014
Tabled by Ms Luise AMTSBERG, Ms Tineke STRIK, Ms Marit MAIJ, Mr Klaas de VRIES, Mr Michael MCNAMARA, Mr Boriss CILEVIČS
Votes: 50 in favor 102 against 17 abstentions
In the draft recommendation, after paragraph 4.5, insert the following paragraph:
"explore further possibilities for protected entry into Europe and for opening legal channels for migrants to reach the territory in a regular manner."