Caption: AdoptedRejectedWithdrawnNo electronic votes
23 January 2018
Tabled by the Committee on Culture, Science, Education and Media
In the draft resolution, at the end of paragraph 8, add the following sentence: "Member States should be encouraged to request that their national sports organisations be certified to the currently applicable ISO 37001 (anti-bribery) and ISO 20121 (event sustainability) standards."
Explanatory note
These ISO standards already exist and are also applicable to sports organisations. As mentioned in paragraph 82 of the report, ISO 37001(2016) is a step forward in sports governance which could be imposed on those organising major sports events or those who receive public subsidies of over a certain sum.
23 January 2018
Tabled by the Committee on Culture, Science, Education and Media
In the draft resolution, paragraph 17.1, replace the words "the Assembly report entitled "Working towards a framework for modern sports governance" (Doc. 14464), paragraphs 44-46 and 70-74" with the following words: "the Appendix to this resolution".
Explanatory note
Technical correction. When the committee adopted the draft resolution on 4 December 2017, neither the Addendum nor its recommendations were not yet prepared. Subject to the approval of the Addendum and the adoption of Amendment 1, it is possible to refer directly to the Appendix.
23 January 2018
Tabled by the Committee on Culture, Science, Education and Media
In the draft resolution, paragraph 18.1, replace the words "the Assembly report entitled “Working towards a framework for modern sports governance” (Doc. 14464), paragraphs 44-46 and 70-74" with the following words: "the Appendix to this resolution".
Explanatory note
Technical correction. When the committee adopted the draft resolution on 4 December 2017, neither the Addendum nor its recommendations were not yet prepared. Subject to the approval of the Addendum and the adoption of Amendment 1, it is possible to refer directly to the Appendix.
23 January 2018
Tabled by the Committee on Culture, Science, Education and Media
In the draft resolution, replace paragraph 20 with the following paragraph:
"The Assembly further calls on international multi-stakeholder platforms to: 1. include in their work as varied a range of stakeholders as possible in order to foster fresh thinking, innovative ideas and modern approaches in facing new challenges; besides individually offering new complementary dynamics and solutions to the issues of sports governance and integrity, to draw upon their strengths and synergies and co-operate actively with one another; 2. undertake a broad-based discussion on harmonising good governance standards and elaborating an ISO certification standard on governance of sports organisations; 3. offer monitoring, consultancy and coaching to sports organisations of various sizes in order to help them through institutional reforms; 4. as a prerequisite for securing independent oversight over governance of sport and getting truthful, objective and credible results of the evaluation, to establish an independent compliance assessment of the implementation of the accepted common standards, in particular through developing a sports ethics rating system that would be implemented by (a) professional fit-for-purpose agency(ies)."
Explanatory note
The committee sees the original version referring to specific multi-stakeholder platforms as being too restrictive and prefers the ideas to be kept more “generic” in order to stay in line with the spirit of the explanatory memorandum.
23 January 2018
Tabled by the Committee on Culture, Science, Education and Media
In the draft resolution, after paragraph 20, insert the following paragraph:
"The Assembly invites stakeholders, including sports governing bodies, governments, non-governmental bodies, sports industry, sponsors, etc., to jointly set up a global sports governance foundation with its own multi-stakeholder board of advisors, a proper board of directors and independent funding. This foundation could, inter alia, focus on the creation and evolution of the rating model and offer grants to sports organisations that are willing to voluntarily solicit their rating and to governments or sports governing bodies who wish to commission unsolicited rating of any sport organisation."
Explanatory note
In line with the conclusions of the explanatory memorandum (paragraph 142), the proposal to set up a global sports governance foundation completes the sports governance framework model and also answers the question of financial sustainability of the rating system.
23 January 2018
Tabled by the Committee on Culture, Science, Education and Media
In the draft resolution, paragraph 22, replace the words "the global harmonisation of governance standards" with the following words: "the promotion of global sports governance standards, notably as regards the harmonisation of core governance criteria".
Explanatory note
This part of the sentence was perceived as limiting. The European Commission Erasmus+ programme supports a variety of projects on sports governance standards, including the Council of Europe projects, which it should be encouraged to continue to support.
23 January 2018
Tabled by the Committee on Culture, Science, Education and Media
In the draft resolution, paragraph 23, replace the word "resolves" with the following words: "invites its Committee on Culture, Science, Education and Media".
Explanatory note
Under the original proposal the decision to establish the Alliance would require a fresh report and the adoption of a new resolution. This amendment speeds the process: the committee would submit a proposal directly to the Bureau of the Assembly for decision, without the need to adopt a new resolution.
23 January 2018
Tabled by the Committee on Culture, Science, Education and Media
At the end of the draft resolution, insert the following Appendix: "1. Sports organisations at local, national and international level are called upon to: Concerning Transparency • make public their vision/mission/values and a strategy plan that specifies how to achieve them; • make public their statute, rules and regulations on their website; • make public the list of members and the basic information of their officials; • make public the agenda and minutes of the their General Assembly meetings; • make public reports/decisions taken by executive bodies and commissions; • make public an annual general activity report on their websites; • make public an annual financial report, externally audited according to recognised international standards, including compensation, benefits and/or salary of its president, board members, executive staff and senior officials (where applicable). Concerning Democracy • hold regular, transparent, free and fair elections of the governing bodies. These have to be based on a detailed electoral regulation, including secret ballots, term limits, eligibility check carried out by a specific independent committee, opportunities for the candidates to present their programme/manifesto, guarantees for gender equality on the board and with regard to the leading officials; • ensure that the distribution of representative positions in governing bodies reflects gender balance and encourages, to the extent possible, diversity and fair geographical representation; • put in place a clear governance structure, taking into account the principle of separation of powers; • establish procedural guarantees for a democratic decision-making process: meeting of their General Assembly at least once a year; meeting of the governing bodies on a regular basis; written reports on the basis of the bodies’ decisions, with sound regulations for open or secret ballots be used depending on the need either to ensure higher transparency or to safeguards anonymity of choices; • set up guarantees for an efficient decision-making process: clear and auditable separation of functions between executive, administrative and commercial activities; appointment of the management (e.g. directors and top officials) on the basis of objective criteria (integrity, relevant knowledge, skills and experience) and an impeccable professional history; internal management communication and coordination; • develop external cooperation with governments, Olympic movement, international and non-governmental agencies on integrity issues. Concerning Integrity • set up independent audit and compliance committees, responsible for: ensuring the adequacy of the organisation’s financial reporting and the integrity of the Organisation’s financial statement; assisting the board for the compensation of company executives in the absence of a remuneration committee; checking the organisation’s nominations and appointments and carrying out the eligibility check for the elective offices in the absence of a nomination committee; elaborating risk management strategy and processes; • conduct an ethical and disciplinary control based on: ethics/integrity code, inspired by the IOC Code of Ethics; clear rules on conflicts of interests; disciplinary rules to combat match-fixing and doping; independent bodies (Ethics and Disciplinary Committees) and a mechanism to manage comments and allegations by whistle-blowers; • ensure internal appeal mechanisms and external channel of complaint and dispute resolutions. Concerning Development and Responsibility • adopt a financial redistribution policy and programmes for their main stakeholders; • allocate resources in declared non-profit objectives, in particular in grassroots activities; • set up an environmental and social responsibility strategy or programme(s), including social and sporting legacy requirements for those (countries, cities, communities) hosting all their events and a close cooperation with governmental and non-governmental agencies on social responsibility issues; • elaborate an athletes’ policy comprising: a clear anti-discrimination policy; education programmes and assistance during and after career; specific actions to promote health and safety, in accordance with the relevant regulations on the protection of the athletes, spectators, workers, children, youth and other vulnerable groups. 2. Sport has other specific sides that need to be taken into consideration when developing proactive policies and regulatory frameworks. These concern ensuring: - level playing field and protection of athletes, including against doping, match-fixing, illegal betting, abuse or trafficking; minimum requirements for athletes’ contracts; youth development in sport; - the integrity of sports events, including bidding processes and selection of event hosts, ticket pricing and distribution, selection of sponsors, granting media broadcasting rights, building event infrastructure for major events, respect of the bidder and its commercial partners to human rights and labour standards. 3. Following in the steps of the new 2016 IOC Code of Ethics, the core criteria of good governance in sport should explicitly refer to the respect for international conventions on protecting human rights, notably but not exclusively as regards the respect of human dignity, rejection of discrimination of any kind on whatever grounds and rejection of all forms of harassment, be it physical, professional or sexual, and any physical or mental injuries. 4. When elaborating the core criteria of good governance in sport, convergence should also be sought with the United Nations Convention against Corruption, the Council of Europe conventions on corruption [the Criminal Law Convention on Corruption (ETS No. 173), the Civil Law Convention on Corruption (ETS No. 174), the Additional Protocol to the Criminal Law Convention on Corruption (CETS No. 191)] as well as with the G20/OECD Principles of Corporate Governance."
23 January 2018
Tabled by the Committee on Culture, Science, Education and Media
In the draft recommendation, at the end of paragraph 3, insert the following words: "It calls upon the Committee of Ministers to urge all member States to join EPAS.".
Explanatory note
EPAS is the engine of intergovernmental work on sport in the Council of Europe; however, eight member States (Czech Republic, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Slovak Republic, Turkey, Ukraine and United Kingdom) are not yet members of this partial agreement. The Assembly should continue to encourage them to join, as it has in previous resolutions and recommendations.
23 January 2018
Tabled by the Committee on Culture, Science, Education and Media
In the draft recommendation, replace the words "the active role EPAS" with the following words: "the role of the Council of Europe, notably through the active involvement of EPAS,".
Explanatory note
This amendment is a factual correction. Formally speaking, it is the Council of Europe and not EPAS that is represented in the new International Partnership against Corruption in Sport (IPACS). However, EPAS has played a pivotal role in setting up IPACS and this merit should be emphasised.
23 January 2018
Tabled by the Committee on Culture, Science, Education and Media
In the draft recommendation, paragraph 5.2.1, replace the words "the Assembly report entitled "Working towards a framework for modern sports governance" (Doc. 14464), paragraphs 44-46 and 70-74" with the following words: "the Appendix to this resolution".
Explanatory note
Technical correction. When the committee adopted the draft resolution on 4 December 2017, neither the Addendum nor its recommendations were not yet prepared. Subject to the approval of the Addendum and the adoption of Amendment 1, it is possible to refer directly to the Appendix.