Ending the detention of “socially maladjusted” persons
Recommendation 2275
(2024)
- Author(s):
- Parliamentary Assembly
- Origin
- Text
adopted by the Standing Committee, acting on behalf of
the Assembly, on 24 May 2024 (see Doc. 15983, report of the Committee on Social Affairs, Health and
Sustainable Development, rapporteur: Mr Stefan Schennach).
1. The right to liberty is one of
the most fundamental human rights. It is guaranteed in Article 5
of the European Convention on Human Rights (ETS No. 5, “the Convention”).
However, the Convention includes a limitation to the right to liberty
specifically on the basis of mental impairment, drug or alcohol
use, or not having a fixed abode. The formulation of Article 5.1.e, reportedly stemming from the
eugenics movement, states that “persons of unsound mind, alcoholics
or drug addicts or vagrants” can be lawfully detained. These persons have
been referred to as “socially maladjusted”, including in the past
by the European Court of Human Rights (the Court), an approach that
is considered discriminatory and stigmatising in the community of
human rights defenders.
2. The Convention is the only international human rights treaty
that excludes these groups from the full enjoyment of the right
to liberty. This is problematic, as detaining such vulnerable persons
effectively puts them at higher risk of systematic rights violations
on the sole ground that they might hypothetically pose a danger
to others or that their own interest may necessitate their detention.
The initial draft of the Convention did not contain a reference
to “socially maladjusted” persons; indeed, the Parliamentary Assembly,
in 1949, had recommended a text closer to the Universal Declaration
of Human Rights.
3. In the last seventy years, there has been a worldwide paradigm
shift to a human rights-based approach, as exemplified by the United
Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, ratified
by all member States of the Council of Europe except Liechtenstein.
The United Nations’ interpretation of the rights of persons with
disabilities and the interpretation given by the Committee on the
Rights of Persons with Disabilities do not allow for the deprivation
of liberty based on an actual or perceived disability. The interpretation
provided by the United Nations is, however, very seldom applied
in the context of the European Court of Human Rights, since the
formulation of Article 5.1.e does
not oblige the Court to do so.
4. The idea of social control – whether of persons with psychosocial
disabilities, of persons who use drugs or alcohol or of persons
without a fixed abode – is not compatible with our 21st-century
understanding of human rights. The Assembly underlines the urgent
need for the Council of Europe, as the leading regional human rights
organisation, to fully integrate the worldwide paradigm shift to
a modern human rights-based approach in its work. The time has come
to move away from the discriminatory concept of excluding certain
groups from human rights protection. The Assembly thus recommends
that the Committee of Ministers:
4.1 support
member States in taking the necessary steps for the full enjoyment
of the right to liberty by the groups referred to in Article 5.1.
e of the Convention, in co-operation
with the European Union, the United Nations and its agencies (in
particular the World Health Organization), non-governmental organisations
and organisations of persons with lived experience,
inter alia:
4.1.1 in removing
discriminatory limitations on the full enjoyment of the right to
liberty of the groups in question from their constitutions, their
legislation and their policies;
4.1.2 in developing adequately funded, human rights-compliant
strategies for deinstitutionalisation with clear time frames and
benchmarks, with a view to a genuine transition to independent living
for persons with disabilities, persons with mental health problems
and persons who use drugs or alcohol;
4.1.3 in running public awareness-raising campaigns in order
to overcome stereotypes and prejudice surrounding persons with disabilities,
persons with mental health problems, persons who use drugs or alcohol
or who do not have a fixed abode, and promote the full inclusion
in society of these persons;
4.2 call on the Council of Europe Development Bank, the World
Bank and other social development funds such as the European Structural
and Investment Funds to help member States to allocate adequate
resources for support services that avoid the detention and/or institutionalisation
of persons with disabilities, persons with mental health problems
or persons who use drugs or alcohol – such as the strengthening,
creation and maintenance of community-based services (including
drug consumption rooms, therapeutic communities and supportive living
arrangements);
4.3 in line with the unanimously adopted
Recommendation 2158 (2019) “Ending
coercion in mental health: the need for a human rights-based approach”
and with
Recommendation
2227 (2022) “Deinstitutionalisation of persons with
disabilities”, adopt guidance to member States promoting voluntary
measures in mental healthcare services and pay due attention, in
its further consideration of the draft additional protocol to the
Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Dignity of the Human
Being with regard to the Application of Biology and Medicine: Convention
on Human Rights and Biomedicine (ETS No. 164, “Oviedo Convention”)
concerning the protection of human rights and dignity of persons
with regard to involuntary placement and involuntary treatment within
mental healthcare services, to ensuring that any Council of Europe
guidance is fully in line with the United Nations Convention on
the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, the guidance of the United
Nations and its agencies and widely accepted best practice.