25/01/2022 | 11:45:07 I think Mr Mogens JENSEN I understood you and the Swedish colleagues also, maybe the Finnish, but the rest of the Plenary did not understand. I do think you had a message about the technical problems, so it should be clearer. If you are not in a situation where you can talk English, maybe German, you have several possibilities. There is a technical problem with the online system because... Is it okay again? Mr Mogens JENSEN, I ask you once more because I think you had a serious message... 25/01/2022 | 11:35:34 Fine by Ms Petra BAYR. I assume that the Committee is in favour. Yes, the Chair of the Committee confirms that. I will now put the oral sub-Amendment to the vote. The vote is open. The vote is closed. I called for the result to be displayed. The oral sub-Amendment is agreed to. We continue considering Amendment 5 as amended. Does anyone wish to speak against Amendment 5? I see no one in the Plenary. There is no one on the screen. What is the opinion of the Committee on the Amendment? The... 25/01/2022 | 11:33:17 Thank you so much. Mr Fourat BEN CHIKHA wishes to propose an oral sub-amendment as follows: In Amendment 5, replace the words "and gender identity" with the words "gender identity and sex characteristics". In my opinion the oral sub-amendment is in order under our rules. However, do ten or more members object to the oral sub‑amendment being debated? Please, could those who object raise their hand in the hemicycle? For those who are on the remote system, ask for the floor. Ten or more members... 25/01/2022 | 11:25:57 The position of the Committee is that it has rejected the Amendment by two-thirds majority. I shall now put the Amendment to the vote. The vote is open. The vote is closed and I ask for the result. So, Amendment 7 is rejected. Thank you. Then we go back and continue. I start with Amendment 1. Ms Petra BAYR, you have supported this Amendment. I ask if anyone wants to speak against the Amendment. Is there somebody on the screen? What is the opinion of the Committee on the Amendment? In favour... 25/01/2022 | 11:20:19 Yeah, I see. I also have 3 more on the screen that want point of order, and I also see Mr John HOWELL in the plenary who wants point of order. I think we have so many messages now that I think we have to go back even though I am advised not to. I think that would be the best. There's no misunderstanding that we take this fair. OK, I'll just find the page. We try to do it fair and in order. With that there's no misunderstanding. I do not want any misunderstanding and I go now back to Ms Tonia... 25/01/2022 | 11:11:00 Thank you, Ms Tonia ANTONIAZZI. Iif that is the case, we vote on it. No? Are there ten people who want to support this amendment? No? We need ten people to support Ms Tonia ANTONIAZZI's rejection. Those who want to support Ms Tonia ANTONIAZZI have to raise in the plenary, those who want to show their support virtually, have to raise their hand. I see there is only one in the plenary. What is on the screen? One on the screen. So it is two but it has not reached ten. Can you confirm that the... 25/01/2022 | 11:08:21 Ms Annicka ENGBLOM confirms that is the case. Does anyone object? If so, please ask for the floor by raising your hand in the hemicycle for those who are present or via the remote system. I see none. Since there is no objection, I declare that Amendments 2, 3, 4, 12 and 13 to the draft resolution and Amendment 6 to the draft recommendation have been agreed upon. Are there any objections? No. Then I continue about this rejection of amendments in Committee by a two-thirds majority. Sorry. It is... 25/01/2022 | 11:07:07 Thank you so much, Chairperson of the Committee, Ms Annicka ENGBLOM. The debate is closed. Now we are going to the consideration of amendments in Document 15425 and the draft resolution. The Committee on Equality and Non-Discrimination has presented a draft resolution and you find it, as I mentioned, in the document to which 15 amendments have been tabled. There is also a recommendation to which one amendment has been tabled. I will now go through the unanimously approved amendments. I... 25/01/2022 | 10:57:49 Thank you so much. That concludes the list of speakers and speeches of members on the speaker's list who have been physically or remotely present during the debate. I see we have some colleagues that were not connected, but have not been able to speak, they may be given to the table office. Is it so? Who is the one calling asking for the floor? I just want to complete the publication in the official report. I remind colleagues that typed texts can be submitted no later than four hours after... 28/09/2021 | 18:04:46 President, thank you, Dear colleagues, first of all let me warmly thank our rapporteur Ms Nicole TRISSE and her Secretariat for the work in preparing this report. I shall underline and praise her approach. This was not an easy task, not at all. She has worked in a collegial manner, aiming at reaching consensus. This is the best way to achieve progress. Indeed, the issue is not as consensual as one might wish. It demonstrates that progress still needs to be made, both in the political culture...